Please keep in mind as you read the information below that ultrasonic irradiation also causes severe cellular and DNA damage. It causes chromosomal aberrations, disruptions in mitochondrial metabolism and mitochondrial DNA, damage to nuclear DNA, disruptions in cell division, and it even deactivates genetic information contained in DNA. All of this and more is outlined in my forthcoming book, “The Dark Side of Prenatal Ultrasound.”

 

Our children are being exposed to MASSIVE amounts of manmade radiation from the time they are in the womb. ALL forms of manmade radiation are HARMFUL. There is no doubt we are going to be seeing serious issues with fertility in the children born after 1990, with increasing instances for the children born later. Cancer, tumors, hearing loss, autism and other serious neurological and developmental disorders, growth retardation, heart problems, etc. – these are just a few of the many disorders and diseases that our children are likely to suffer due to radiation exposure.

 

Prenatal ultrasound IS radiation. It is being used and abused by the medical establishment and it is condemning our children to genetic, immunological, and reproductive harm. Ultrasound combined with years of exposure to wifi, baby monitors, smart meters, cell phones, cell towers, microwave ovens, etc. means that the children of the future will barely have a chance for survival because of what we have allowed to happen to them. We need to get on this topic now or entire genetic bloodlines are going to be wiped out.

 

Let me also state that I feel RAGE toward the sadistic, psychopathic medical science community that has, for at least 10 decades, imprisoned, tortured, maimed, mutilated, repeatedly irradiated, and satanically sacrificed BILLIONS of helpless, innocent animals that do not have a voice. These disgusting, despicable cowards pick on the tiniest, most vulnerable creatures and for no reason other than sadistic pleasure, they inflict misery and harm on millions. I have ZERO respect for what these satanists/scientists do and in fact, I think they all belong in prison where they should be treated in the exact same way they have treated the animals. The picture below is what triggered this comment and after nearly 5 years of researching ultrasound and reading thousands of studies that contain detailed explanations of the torture of animals, I have had enough. The people responsible for this evil need to be extinguished from our realm.

 

As you read the information below please know that everything that is being said about microwave radiation and wireless communications also applies to ultrasound. They have known that manmade radiation causes genetic, reproductive, and cognitive damage for at least 60 years, and still, they continue to torture animals and expose developing babies to this toxicity. Trusting this evil medical/science/radiation cabal and allowing our children to be exposed to their toxic technologies is one of the most serious mistakes we could have ever made.

 

The information below comes from www.wi-cancer.info which is an amazing resource regarding the dangers of wifi and all radiation-emitting technologies. Full credit for what appears below goes to Amy Worthington at www.wi-cancer.info.

==================================================

In 2004, the European Union’s REFLEX studies produced comprehensive medical research showing that low-level, non-thermal microwave radiation used for wireless communication and entertainment produces the same drastic damage to animal and human DNA as excessive X-radiation.

 

REFLEX scientists proved that Wi-radiation is just as deadly to human DNA as the meltdown radiation from Chernobyl and Fukushima.

 

DNA damage demonstrated by the REFLEX studies is a pathological condition in which the DNA splinters into fragments called micronuclei, seen as a molecular comet tail. Micronuclei damage to DNA is recognized as a definitive precursor of cancer and numerous genetic defects.

 

The REFLEX chart seen above shows normal, intact DNA in the sham photo upper left. It shows DNA damaged (micronucleized) by 1600 chest X-rays in the upper right. The picture at the bottom shows identical DNA damage from 3-G (UMTS) cell phone radiation propagated at 1.8 gigahertz for 24 hours. [46] We can plainly see that the wireless microwave damage generated by tower antennas and Wi-devices is identical to the ionizing X-ray damage. Many additional studies concur that microwave radiation used for Wi-communications not only damages the DNA, but also inhibits crucial repair of that damage. [47] Because the DNA contains chromosomes and genes, it is genetic material. And because RF/microwave radiation can genetically modify the DNA of all living things, Wi-irradiated populations can be technically referred to as GMOs (genetically modified organisms).

 

The American Cancer Society states that cancer cells develop from damage to the DNA. The National Cancer Institute defines cancer as cells that grow uncontrollably after the DNA becomes damaged. [48]

 

♦ Microwave currents flowing through a pregnant woman infiltrate uterine amniotic fluids with radiation documented to damage DNA. [49]

 

♦ Radiation which damages DNA is a teratogen, capable of causing: miscarriage, embryo growth retardation, premature birth, low birth weight (a major problem in USA), cognitive dysfunction, delayed development in infants and many types of birth defects. [50]

 

♦ Especially vulnerable to wireless radiation are the precious fetal stem cells which cannot adjust to microwave abuse, nor can they repair damage to their DNA. Recent data suggests that epigenetic mutations in stem cells have a connection to the development of human cancers. [51]

 

♦ Fetuses exposed to any kind of radiation capable of damaging DNA have a highly increased risk of later developing cancer, [52] the number one disease killer of US children.

 

Therefore, the Russian government and numerous scientists in the West warn pregnant women to avoid exposure to microwave radiation. [53] Yet, millions of young American women remain in willful ignorance about a pernicious, mechanical energy force that has life-and-death ramifications for their offspring. Perverse is a generation that believes wireless Internet surfing, text messages, social media and selfies are more important than the health and safety of unborn babies.

 

THE LATEST SCIENCE ON MICROWAVE DAMAGE TO THE FETUS

 

Wi-Fi is a microwave modulation technique used by millions of people to wirelessly connect their computers and mobile devices to the Internet. Wi-Fi radiation has never been proven safe for human exposure. Radiation peddlers adore Wi-Fi because it is a lucrative and unregulated technology. Anyone anywhere can activate Wi-Fi antennas and remain exempt from regulatory oversight. Most buildings in the USA are now heavily polluted by Wi-Fi antennas, which expose people to even higher levels of microwave energy than cell towers outdoors. Modulated, information-bearing Wi-Fi pollution flows through human flesh as the VOLTAGE OF CANCER in these microwave frequencies: 2.4, 3.6, 4.9, 5 and 5.9 gigahertz. The 60 gigahertz (millimeter wave) Wi-Fi is coming.

 

Wi-Fi radiation is Group 1A carcinogen and therefore a substantial threat to public health, as documented in 2017 by Dr. Martin L. Pall, Professor Emeritus at Washington State University. LINK

 

Yet, Wi-Fi antennas poison the interior of nearly every US building, public and private. Tasteless, odorless and impossible to see or hear without metering equipment, Wi-Fi radiation: abnormally clumps red blood cells, opens the blood-brain barrier to toxins and pathogens, kills human immune cells, stresses the entire endocrine system and raises the risk for diabetes.

 

Audio detection equipment demonstrates that Wi-Fi transmissions have the sound signature of relentless humming static, while the underlying Wi-Fi beacon signal mimics a woodpecker sound. Wi-Fi microwaves whipsaw the polarity of human tissues at even higher frequencies than the 1.8 gigahertz cell phone radiation used to obliterate human DNA in the REFLEX studies. The disease-causing potential of Wi-Fi radiation is astronomical and well-documented by medical and scientific literature spanning decades.

 

♦ By 1972, the Naval Medical Research Institute at Bethesda, Maryland, had compiled over 2000 medical and scientific studies documenting the many health-destructive effects of RF/microwave radiation generated at both thermal (tissue-heating) and non-thermal power levels. So immense was this collection that the studies were cataloged into 17 categories of morbidity. [54]

 

♦ In 1992, Phillips Laboratory’s Electromagnetic Effects Division at Kirkland Air Force Base in New Mexico released a comprehensive report documenting the horrific biological effects of low-level microwave exposure including: brain damage, behavioral aberrations, fetal abnormalities, altered blood chemistry and immune system dysfunction. [55]

 

♦ In 1993, FDA officials authored a memo stating that animal studies “strongly suggest” that microwaves can “accelerate the development of cancer.” Top FDA officials wrote: “Of eight chronic animal experiments known to us, five resulted in increased number of malignancies, accelerated progression of tumors, or both.” [56]

 

Wi-Fi radiation in the gigahertz range is especially carcinogenic. In the 1980s, the US Air Force spent $4.5 million to study test rats irradiated with 2.45 gigahertz radiation at low, non-thermal levels. [57] Compared to non-exposed rats, the irradiated rats suffered:

 

16% more benign tumors

100% more metastatic tumors (cancer had spread)

260% more primary malignant tumors

A significant number of these irradiated rats developed endocrine tumors. Other researchers of that era showed that 2.45 gigahertz caused cancer-prone mice to suffer a 41% increase in tumors and a highly significant 12.5% increase in chromosome damage to bone marrow and blood. [58] Later in the 1990s, researchers at the University of Washington used low-level 2.45 gigahertz to damage the brains of rats and rip apart their DNA. [59]

 

Within the last twenty years, scores of additional new studies have confirmed the destructive properties of gigahertz Wi-Fi radiation which can interfere with all cellular processes and: cause abnormal heart function [60] induce seizures [61] form eye cataracts [62] promote pregnancy abnormalities [63] cause fetal malformations and disabilities, including reduced memory and learning capacity [64] initiate new cancers while accelerating the growth of existing cancers. [65]

 

Unfortunately, this scientific reality is an inconvenience which the US business community, the US medical establishment and the US military will not officially acknowledge. Wi-Fi is deemed necessary for unlimited profits and for unlimited tracking and mass surveillance of the population. Therefore, prolific scientific and medical evidence demonstrating the dangers of Wi-radiation has been ignored and suppressed by vested interests. Human health is considered expendable in the relentless quest for the wealth and power delivered by Wi-technologies.

 

Americans enjoyed the Internet long before they had access to Wi-Fi. This Wi-Cancer.info website is managed with computers which do not use Wi-Fi, but instead, rely on cabled Ethernet connections. Those who conduct research for this site work in buildings completely free of indoor microwave radiation. We are hoping that millions of others will join us in the movement for healthy, cabled Internet as people become better informed about the VOLTAGE OF CANCER.

 

Because Wi-Fi is completely unregulated and because proper health warnings are not required by law, millions of trusting Americans submit to Wi-Fi poisoning without question. In a nation deeply concerned about the safety of nearly everything, it is ironically legal for Wi-Fi fanatics to bombard their customers, patients and neighbors (even against their will) with wave pollution documented in myriad scientific studies to be a confirmed human carcinogen!

How did we get here?

 

Please also see the following information from the resources section on Wi-Fi in Schools found at https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/cell-phoneswireless/wifi-in-schools/


Excerpts from Letter to Principal on Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi devices were never and are not currently pre-market tested for long-term safety. US regulations on wireless radiation exposure limits have not been updated during the past two decades and they were developed well before Wi-Fi was even invented. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has been long working on this as a children’s health issue and has repeatedly advised the US government to reassess regulations regarding human exposure to wireless radiation. The AAP states that children and pregnant women need more protections, and AAP points to research that indicates that children’s brains and bodies absorb proportionately more of this radiation due to their unique physiology. Children are at higher risk as their brain and immune system are still developing.


Peer reviewed research has demonstrated a myriad of adverse effects of EMF radiation including increased brain cancer, DNA breaks, oxidative stress and immune dysfunction, altered brain development, sleep changes, hyperactivity, and memory and cognitive problems.


Due to these research findings, the California Department of Health, the Connecticut Department of Health, many international medical organizations and more than 20 nations are recommending RFR exposure reduction, especially for children. In 2015, an Appeal, now with over 237 signatories, was launched by scientists from 41 countries who have peer reviewed publications on electromagnetic fields. The Appeal calls on the United Nations to reduce exposure and educate the public.


Some examples of the scientific research include:


  • The US National Toxicology Program $25 million animal study on long-term exposure to radiofrequency EMF radiation found DNA Damage, heart damage, increased brain tumors and increased heart tumors deemed “clear evidence of cancer.” Importantly, this study was launched almost two decades ago by the FDA because the US government had not performed research on the long-term effects of RFR exposure and the FDA wanted data on long-term safety. The EPA was defunded from developing proper safety standards in 1996, and since then there has been no no systematic review of the science by any US agency.
  • Researchers with the renowned Ramazzini Institute in Italy published findings that lab animals exposed to environmental levels of RFR developed the same types of cancers as the US National Toxicology Program found in their large-scale lifetime animal study.
  • In 2011 radiofrequency radiation was classified as a Class 2 B possible carcinogen by the World Health Organization International Agency for the Research on Cancer. Since that date, the published peer reviewed scientific evidence has significantly increased increased. Now many scientists are of the opinion that the weight of current peer reviewed evidence supports the conclusion that radiofrequency radiation should be regarded as a human carcinogen (Hardell and Carlberg 2017, Peleg et al., 2018, Miller et al 2018.)
  • Kaiser Permanente researchers have published several studies linking pregnant women’s exposure to electromagnetic fields to the endpoints of increased miscarriage and increased obesity and asthma in the woman’s prenatally exposed children. Watch a clip from a webinar where Dr. De-Kun Li of Kaiser presents this research here.
  • When combined with lead or a known carcinogen, RFR has been shown to magnify the toxic effects.  For example, RFR at levels far below FCC limits more than doubled the numbers of liver and lung tumors in carcinogen-exposed mice (Lerchl 2015). Researchers found that higher cell phone radiation exposure was associated increased ADHD symptoms in children with lead levels in their blood.
  • A medical research team at Yale, led by Dr. Hugh Taylor, Chief of Obstetrics at Yale Medicine, found radiofrequency radiation exposure led to higher hyperactivity, poorer memory, and altered brain function—corroborating prior published research findings of altered brain development after exposure. These studies prompted the doctors and other experts to initiate an EPA recognized educational campaign called The BabySafe Project urging pregnant women to reduce wireless exposure to minimize risks to their babies’ brain development.
  • A published literature review found that the majority of research studies on the topic found exposure increased oxidative stress and free radicals—an effect known to lead to a myriad of chronic diseases.
  • Wireless radiation alters sleep patterns in replicated research in both animals and humans. For example, an animal study found an hour of exposure to RFR caused a one-hour delay for rats to drift into REM or deep sleep. Human studies have found exposure reduces REM sleep, alters the EEG signal and results in altered performance.
In response to this research, a growing number of public and private schools are removing the wireless networks from schools and implementing practical solutions. Examples of best practices schools are following include:


  • The United Educators of San Francisco (UESF), at a joint health committee with the San Francisco Unified School District, has approved going forward with a resolution for safer technology. The resolution became official as of May 23rd, 2018 and the “Resolution on Enhancing Technology Safety in San Francisco Unified School District” and press release be found on UESF website.
  • The Collaborative for High Performance Schools (the United States’ first green building rating program especially designed for K-12 schools) has developed Best Practices for LOW EMF classrooms which includes using corded, not cordless phones, using ethernet connected, not wireless computers in the classroom.
  • The Maryland State Children’s Environmental Health and Protection Advisory Council issued a report and recommendations to the Department of Education to recommend local school districts reduce classroom wireless radiation exposures by providing wired—rather than wireless—Internet connections. The MD report states that “WiFi can be turned off” and instead “a wired local area network (LAN) can provide a reliable and secure form of networking…without any microwave electromagnetic field exposure.” The report points out that construction and renovations can be a time to install wired connections. “If a new classroom is to be built, or electrical work is to be carried out in an existing classroom, network cables can be added at the same time, providing wired (not wireless) network access with minimal extra cost and time.”
  • The Chief Technology Officer of Montgomery County Maryland Schools (one of the top School Districts in the country) shared Maryland’s recommendations to all staff. Some children in Montgomery County Schools are given wired rather than wired computers upon parent request.
  • Ashland, Massachusetts became the first US School District to institute “Best Practices” posted in every classroom to “turn the Wi-Fi off when not in use and keep devices away from the body.” Other public school districts are taking action, and two examples are the Onteora School District in New York State adopted “Best Practices with Wi-Fi” and the Worcester, Massachusetts School Committee voted to approve “Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure” to be posted on the Worcester District Website.
  • “Guidelines for Safer Use of Wireless Technology in Classrooms” were developed for the New York State Teachers’ Union who later hosted a webinar on the risks of wireless technologies.


The New Jersey Education Association recently published an article entitled, “Minimize Health Risks from Wireless Devices” and detailed several recommendations on reducing the health risks of technology: “Keep devices away from the body” and “hard wire all devices, including printers, projectors and boards.” Please download a PDF with the recommendations at this link.


The American Academy of Pediatrics is informing parents and the public about this issue in several ways. In addition to their letters to the US government, they have issued ten recommendations on how to reduce RFR radiation exposure. They also have addressed health concerns related to cell towers and reference a study that they say “confirmed concerns that living nearby mobile phone base stations increased the risk for developing headaches, memory problems, dizziness, depression, and sleep problems,” and concludes that “short-term exposure to these fields in experimental studies have not always shown negative effects, but this does not rule out cumulative damage from these fields, so larger studies over longer periods are needed to help understand who is at risk. In large studies, an association has been observed between symptoms and exposure to these fields in the everyday environment.”
Many countries and local governments have policies addressing wireless in the classroom:
  • France has banned Wi-Fi in kindergarten and restricts Wi-Fi in school by having the wireless off as the default setting and teachers have wired (not wireless) computers for Internet access. Schools are being hardwired, and in situations where wireless is needed it is only turned on for a short duration in the classroom as needed and turned off after use. France also has banned cell phones in elementary/middle schools and started educating the public years ago with public health initiatives about how to reduce exposure.
  • Cyprus has removed Wi-Fi from elementary classrooms and has a strong public awareness campaign educating parents, teenagers and pregnant women.
  • Belgium has banned cell phones manufactured for young children and also banned Wi-Fi in some regions.
  • Haifa, Israel has installed corded connections in all schools, and the countries Israel and Germany officially recommend wired connections in schools and reducing children’s exposure to RFR.
  • The Queensland Department of Education issued “Guide to Safe Technology” that states, “follow the manufacturer’s usage guideline, operate from a table or bench — not on your lap” and “use ‘hands-free’ devices to keep smart/mobile phones away from your head and body.”
  • The Child and Youth Service of the Department of Public Instruction of Geneva, Switzerland issued a letter to be transmitted to all teachers about the health risks of digital technology, detailing how screens can affect sleep, eyesight, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity, and recommends “Only switch your WLAN on when you need it. With laptops, in particular, it is a good idea to switch the WLAN off as otherwise the device will repeatedly try to connect to a network, leading to unnecessary radiation and a shorter battery life” and “Don’t hold your laptop close to your body while it is connected to a WLAN.”


Multiple industry white papers have deemed electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure as high-risk. EMFs are defined as a “pollutant” by insurance companies alongside smoke, chemicals and asbestos. Due to these evaluations, it is industry standard to have an “electromagnetic field exclusions” clause in insurance policies, such as exemplified by the Portland Oregon Public School and California State University insurance policies. If a school wants to obtain insurance coverage for EMFs, they may need to purchase additional “Pollution Liability” policy enhancement coverage. In addition, some newer policies—such as this City of Ann Arbor Michigan Policy—are not only excluding damages but also excluding paying for the defense of “any supervision, instruction, recommendation, warning or advice given or which should have been given” in connection to injury from electromagnetic field exposures. When parents query their schools on the insurance coverage for injury from the Wi-Fi systems and/or the cell towers on the school property, they are usually told that there is not coverage.


In fact, all wireless companies warn their shareholders—in mandated annual 10k filings—that they may incur financial losses from lawsuits related to the electromagnetic radiation emissions of their products. For example,
AT&T states, “We may incur significant expenses defending such suits or government charges and may be required to pay amounts or otherwise change our operations in ways that could materially adversely affect our operations or financial results.” Wireless companies have not been able to obtain insurance to cover this risk from their products, because no insurance company will cover the liability for them. As Crown Castle (a company building wireless infrastructure) states in their 10K filings, “If a connection between radio frequency emissions and possible negative health effects were established, our operations, costs, or revenues may be materially and adversely affected. We currently do not maintain any significant insurance with respect to these matters.”


Internationally renowned doctors have written on this issue with recommendations to reduce exposure to Wi-Fi in schools. Please read their letters here. The Santa Clara Medical Association published an article online, highlighting the health risks: “Wi-Fi in Schools”.


The reality is that in the United States, brain cancer rates are rising among children and teenagers. The US CDC presented 2018 research that found brain, renal, hepatic, and thyroid cancers are increasing among individuals under 20 years old in the USA after analyzing 2001–2014 cancer statistics from 48 states covering 98% of the US population.


 This is from our resources on Wi-Fi in School found at https://ehtrust.org/key- issues/cell-phoneswireless/ wifi-in-schools/