Those Vaxxed for “COVID” Are Now Walking Wireless Devices

Source Article Here


Are the Jabbed Connected to Bluetooth?

The fact that the numbers change with the people passing by only makes sense when these people themselves are the devices.”
This istheir own mark-of-the-beast-number.”

From JS – (


Here are a dozen smartphone screenshots I took Monday in front of a supermarket in Germany.

It looks like the inoculated are all having their own individual (kind of) IP address which appears on the screen when bluetooth is being activated and scans the surrounding for reachable bluetooth devices.

As you can see I did that for five minutes and the digits change with the ongoing stream of pedestrians and vehicles. The addresses all have the same format.

Twelve digits separated by colon, a mix of numbers and alphabetic characters.

This is definitely not how a reachable bluetooth device looks like on the screen. Normally you get the name of the device and a symbol that shows what kind of device, e.g. headset, phone, car hifi etc.

The more people are around the more numbers appear and the list changes from second to second.

I’m not a pro but I know a little bit about computers and I have never seen anything like that before.

My web research resulted in absolutely nothing except some others who noticed the same phenomenon. The fact that the numbers change with the people passing by only makes sense when these people themselves are the devices.

If  true, everybody with a smartphone (except iphone) can see with his own eyes now what the whole C-agenda is about. Everybody can check this by himself. Even the inoculated non-believers can go to the woods or elsewhere where they are alone and try it out. The same number they always see on their screen no matter when they look at it is their own mark-of-the-beast-number.

Seems like tptb created this whole C-scenario amongst others to get everybody injected with a jab that contains graphene oxide and that self-assembles (this ability is one of graphene oxides characteristics) in the body to some kind of artificial nervous system which connects the person to the smart grid either directly via 5G or via the persons smartphone.

And I suppose this is only one aspect of the evil potential of the jab.


Bluetooth Vaccine? Does the Injected COVID Non-Vaccine Connect With Devices?
Published on May 25, 2021
By Makia Freeman

“The only problem is that everywhere I go, everywhere I go, everything is trying to connect with me man, like Bluetooth connect to me. I get in the car, my car is trying to connect to me. I go home, my computer’s trying to connect. Like, my phone is trying to connect … the connectivity’s still there. I don’t know how to turn it off. Everywhere I get the same message.”

Those who understand the background to this discovery – including Transhumanism and the Operation Coronavirus-nanotech connection – will perceive that this is another clue that the COVID non-vaccines are injecting some kind of biosensor into people, to begin the process of turning people into nodes on the Smart Grid.

French bluetooth phone pick’s up who’s vaccinated by mobile number! It’s in French, but you’ll understand by watchin

Dr. Chinda Brandolino refers to the technology that makes it possible for the Bluetooth to read codes in inoculated individuals

VAXxed – Bluetooth 5 finding out RFID2020 on people

Covid Vaccines, The Planned for Mark of the Beast part 3

Graphene oxide is made of a single layer of carbon atoms…6 protons, 6 neutrons, and 6 electrons.  That’s what is being injected into people.


First Comment from Ken Adachi


Everyone who receives the Covid Death Jab is hooked up to “The Internet of Things” immediatley following his first Jab. It’s now known that ALL Covid Death Jabs contain Graphene Oxide which is creating the signal being transmitted and registering on that Blue Tooth reader. Dr Carrie Madej explained this AI/Vaxxed “hookup” in great detail in a video that she posted to Youtube on August 17, 2020 (and I re-posted to my Bitchute channel on Sep. 11, 2020).
. .
The AI/Vaxxed “hookup” was later revealed by a Russian hacker in May of 2021 when he hacked into the computer system that was listing all of the Bio-metrics and ID data  on the Russian people who got injected with the Sputnik Jab and zeroed in on the data being transmitted by one of his friend who got the Death Jab. Here’s the video, which I just uploaded tonight while typing these comments, so you can verify the info for yourself (narration in Russian, but translated into English subtitles)

WB writes

Henry, concerning the MAC codes… I’m a retired federal IT Specialist.

These numbers are definitely in a MAC address format, except for one thing.  In a true MAC address the first six hexadecimal characters ALWAYS identify the manufacturer of the device (they will always be the same based on a set manufacturer code) and the last six identify the device itself (such as a network card in a computer… they are UNIQUE based on each device).
So, In this case all 48 binary numbers (each hex number represents four 1’s or 0’s) seem to be identifying a single person.  IF this was just reading cell phones (which I don’t believe it is) then you would see the first six hex characters repeating somewhat as to manufacturer… as there’s only a limited number of manufacturers in the world…the last six however would be totally different for each phone).

Definitely appears EACH INDIVIDUAL is identified with a 12-bit hexadecimal number.


JS Wednesday-

 ok, I’m just back from another trial with a family members smartphone. Same procedure same outcome. I can only repeat myself: Yes, every network device has its own worldwide unique MAC address. But when connected the device is NOT being displayed by its MAC adress but by its name (i.e. see the attached screenshot > headset, soundsystem). How else could one find a desired device in case of connecting? Everybody would have to know the MAC addresses of his devices by rote. And if it wasn’t the people walking by themselves who are the devices but their smartphones, headsets etc – where are the symbols? Since when are devices displayed on a user interface by their MAC address and not by their names/symbols?

I would just like to ask everybody with a smartphone to go to a place with numerous people and try it out himself.

JS Tuesday

is it possible you are picking up their phones?”

No, I don’t think so.
1. I know what a MAC adress is, but my phone never showed any and I don’t know how this should be possible. Would have to be a very peculiar bug in the software or flaw in the hardware if the phone was kaput. It’s five years old but running reliably. No problems at all.
2. If it was a bug or a flaw it would have to show this behaviour with every device in the closer surrounding, but it doesn’t. I only know and have contact with unvaxxed (don’t ask me now how I manage to do that) and they all have smartphones too. And of course I tried it out yesterday and today – nothing! No ‘MAC’ adresses from their devices. No joke. I’m more and more certain that it’s the vaxxed who are tagged. By the way I find it logical that these human IPs are also formatted like MAC adresses. It’s the IoT and the IoB (internet of bodies, like they announced it a couple of years ago).


Doctor on Twitter Brings Forth the Following Images of the Blood of His Vaxxed Patients — Source Link Here











21 thoughts on “Those Vaxxed for “COVID” Are Now Walking Wireless Devices”

  1. I came here from Qwant Search Engine because I was looking for ways to tell the differences between the vast amount of bluetooth devices we have today with Computer peripherals (which may be behind many of the ‘Not Connectable’ MAC addresses I get), smartphones, tablets from those who have been injected with a bioweapon that’s constructing a system within the person.

    I wish there was more images to show the differences. Btw I use BLE scanner app (Android) that has some decent features on it.
    Because every device has a MAC address on it, and it seems every one of them are either Apple, Windows or just a phone icon. Its not straightforward to know if its coming from a specific person.

    Any input or further comments would be appreciated, thanks.

    1. As someone who does not own a cell phone or any wireless devices, I really don’t know how to answer your question. Maybe someone else who reads your comment can answer. Sorry I could not be of more help.

    2. I have found that iphones and any 5G phone will not pick up the mac addresses. I have only been successful using an android 4G phone to pick up the mac addresses in bluetooth

      1. I can verify this as well. In a busy location with old Android phone many Bluetooth IDs appear. With iPhone they do not. Also none seem to show manufacturer Id, as if they are higher digits than the usual Bluetooth ids. As other poster said, also Bluetooth devices usually show icon near the I’d such as a phone or headphone icon. On my Android phone these strange IDs do not show an icon beside them, just the Id. Also you cannot pair to them, it will time out, while you can pair to nearby wireless speakers etc no problem.

    1. Anyone who does NOT take it seriously, is obviously under mind-control and has a television stuck between their ears. WAKE UP.

      1. you are absolutely correct..this is serious. I have been doing my own experiments and i have been 100% correct in picking out the vaxed and unvaxed..100% accurate. There was no informed consent given to these people. We need to have people held accountable with such severe punishments that it can never happen again!

        1. Hi Paula – thanks for your comment. Can you tell me how you able to pick out the vaxed vs unvaxed? Is it with your phone or personal observation? I’d love to know. Thanks.

          1. I have found no new phone will pick up these signals and iphones do not pick it up. I have a LG stylo 4, I thought it was a 3 yr old phone but it is a 5 yr old phone. My brother has a Note 3 and a Note 8 that can pick up these signals. I have continued to test and I have continued to be 100% accurate. This is crimes against humanity, no informed consent was involved. People must know what they have done!

                1. It should not be too difficult. Gather up about 15 people – 5 who never received the shits/5 who did receive the shits and another 5 of whom you’ve no idea their status. Demonstrate that newer devices & iPhone do not produce results but they older Android devices do. Test and record each group, confirm with the unknown group that they are either vexed or not based upon number of results based on number of MAC adds produced. Maybe you havec5 people, 2 results so you confirm that 3 are not vaxed. Who are they? Reconfirm non-vaxxed in blind group.
                  Now write your article. State your purpose, propose your hypothesis, outline your study group, detail your tests for each group. Be as detailed as you can, include MAC addresses listed foe all participants that produce an address. I would also demonstrate that a participants MAC Addy can be linked to them and what that Addy is.

                  Just be sure to demote itcis a layman, basic study, non- professional, non-eduxation institution, non-governmental and post it. At a minimum, it would give the pros and those in the field more data to work with. I know this is an old conversation – I just made my way here tonight.

    1. Your an idiot and can’t read. You can search these addresses. There are multiple sites. You enter in the exact numbers and letters shown with the : in between all of them an no registered devices come up. All devices have the first 6 point to manufacturer

      1. Desiree – I would encourage you to refrain from being rude to other people on this site. I won’t approve any more of your comments if you continue to try to degrade people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.