At last, the first study has emerged regarding the very clear relationship between “coronavirus” outbreaks and the presence of 5G networks. Thanks to Claire Edwards for making this available in English
Study of the correlation between cases of coronavirus and the presence of 5G networks
Author: Bartomeu Payeras i Cifre1
Available at www.tomeulamo.com/fitxers/264_CORONA-5G-d.pdf
Translated from the Spanish by Claire Edwards
Date: March-April 2020
The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects in early 2020 have surprised scientists and politicians. If any study aimed at understanding the phenomenon and which consequently may help to clarify the causes of the pandemic is carried out, it should be promoted and/or taken into consideration. The correlation between cases of coronavirus and the presence of 5G networks has been addressed in alternative media and social networks. It is noteworthy that, at least in Spain, the media have not covered the scientific studies on the subject of 5G, nor asked the government any questions about this in the daily press conferences that it conducts to report on the state of the situation. The team of scientists advising the Spanish government has also failed to raise this issue.
It is common sense that the ability to demonstrate this correlation would be very important data to contribute to the understanding of, and the solution to, the problem.
To assess whether a correlation exists between cases of coronavirus and the presence of 5G networks. Without entering for the moment into subsequent cause-effect approaches in the case of positive results. Given that there is a sufficiently large statistical sample, it is possible for the results obtained to have a high level of reliability.
Material and methods
The study has benefited from the official statistical material published daily, which is a basic and valuable tool. It should be noted that in these publications, the methodology used for counting cases of coronavirus infections does not generally provide real data. In Spain and many other countries, it has not been calculated as there are not enough tests for such analyses. However, this does not alter the results of this study since it is based on the comparative rather than the absolute method of infection. Therefore, in order to avoid statistical error, we will compare the density value of confirmed cases of coronavirus (expressed in number of cases per 1000 inhabitants) instead of absolute values. Since the criterion for counting used by the health authorities within the same state or city is the same, the comparison of published values for different cities or regions will be equally reliable for statistics. Comparisons between different countries of confirmed cases, excluding asymptomatic cases, will be equally reliable. The possible exception of some non-transparent country that could manipulate the publication of its data is beyond the control of this study.
The method used was to compare the incidence (no. of cases per 1000 inhabitants) between countries with and without 5G technology. Between regions of the same country with and without 5G technology. Between cities of the same state with and without 5G technology. Between different neighbourhoods of the same city with the 5G network map of that city. Comparing states with common borders with and without 5G technology. Comparing the case of one state within another, as is the case of San Marino.
– The data for each chart were taken on the same day. Graphic results and data published below:
Chart of the 9 countries with the most infections worldwide.
Chart and rates of infection of the 5 countries with the highest incidence in Europe.
Chart and rates of infection of 4 nearby countries at the same latitude: Portugal,
Spain, Italy, Greece.
San Marino: comparison of rates of infection with Italy and Croatia.
Italy: Incidence chart and 5G network.
Spain: 5G coverage chart and rates of infection.
Barcelona: Charts with 5G coverage and rates of infection.
Madrid: 5G coverage charts and rates of infection.
New York: coronavirus incidence chart and 5G network.
“Border effect” between Mexico and the USA.
Canada, USA and Mexico: chart of 5G networks and rates of infection.
Africa: 5G network chart.
Persian Gulf: 5G network and US military bases.
Chart and rates of infection of China and neighbouring countries.
1. CHART OF THE 9 COUNTRIES WITH THE MOST INFECTIONS WORLDWIDE
2. CHART AND RATES OF INFECTION OF THE 5 COUNTRIES WITH THE HIGHEST INCIDENCE IN EUROPE
3. CHART AND RATES OF INFECTION OF 4 NEARBY COUNTRIES AT THE SAME LATITUDE: PORTUGAL, SPAIN, ITALY, GREECE
“Why San Marino? Because the self-contained nature of the state, and its relatively few restrictions on the use of radio frequency makes it the ideal place to test the latest development in telecoms connectivity.
“Telecom Italia intends to double the number of its mobile sites within the country and will additionally install a network of small cells in downtown San Marino.” https://www.fircroft.com/blogs/s an-marino-set-to-become-the- first-5g-country-72001910124
“Considering very small countries included the worst outbreak in the world is currently recorded in San Marino with 101 cases in a country of 33,400.”
https://www.eturbonews.com/567130/mos t-infected-coronavirus-countries-san- marino-italy-norway-s-korea-switzerland- iran/
6. SPAIN: 5G COVERAGE CHART AND RATES OF INFECTION
Data for cities with 5G should be related to the number of infections in those cities. Since data by city are not available, the comparison has been made with data for autonomous regions. This causes the data of the capitals to be diluted with those of their region.
This is why the comparison in autonomous regions with one or two provinces is more significant: Extremadura, Murcia, Madrid, Navarra, Rioja, Balearic Islands, Asturias or the Canary Islands. Also in Euskadi since the three capital cities have 5G.
7. BARCELONA: CHARTS WITH 5G COVERAGE AND RATES OF INFECTION
8. MADRID: 5G COVERAGE CHARTS AND RATES OF INFECTION
10. “BORDER EFFECT” BETWEEN MEXICO AND THE USA
11. CANADA, USA AND MEXICO: CHART OF 5G NETWORKS AND RATES OF INFECTION
14. CHINA AND NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES: CHART AND RATES OF INFECTION
Results and discussion
To know whether or not the result obtained is that of a random phenomenon, a statistical analysis of the results of an experiment must be carried to calculate the probability of the event occurring. The probability calculation is obtained by dividing the number of favourable cases by the number of possible cases. If the result shows that it is not a random phenomenon, it shows sufficient causal reason to analyse the causes.
To eliminate any upward errors we will always opt for the most conservative numerical option.
Let us therefore calculate the probability of three of the examples analysed above.
(a) Probability that the 9 most contagious countries on the planet are countries with 5G networks.
There are 194 countries on the planet. As of 6 March 2020, according to GSMA, there are 24 countries with 5G technology.
Pr = 24/194 x 23/193 x 22/192 (nine times in total) = 0.1237 x 0.1191 x 0.1145 x 0.1099 x 0.1052 x 0.1005 x 0.0957 x 0.0909 x 0.0860 = = 1.47 x 10 (high -9 ).
The probability is 1 in 680,000,000.
If we include Japan, which also has 5G and rates of infection similar to those of South Korea …the probability is 1 in 8,500,000,000.
(b) Probability that the 5 most contagious countries in Europe have 5G networks.
There are 49 countries in Europe, among which it is currently difficult to know if they currently deploy 5G, as there are 5 that have declared a moratorium, and many others do not have operational networks although companies publish as if they were already operational when they have signed agreements. We will calculate it downwards, as a conservative option, we will assume that about 15 countries have operational 5G systems.
Pr = 15/49 x 14/48 x 13/47 x 12/46 x 11/45 = 0.00157.
The probability is 1 in 637.
(c) The case of San Marino is highly significant. It is located within the Italian territory, with a similar culture, economy, and social level, but presents much higher rates of infection. The only difference is the time of exposure of its citizens to 5G radiation, because it was the first state in the world to implement such technology on 4 September 2018, while in Italy it was 5 June 2019. This opens the door to debate about the likely influence of 5G on the increase in the rates of infection.
Pr = 1/194 x 1/194.
The probability is 1 in 37,636.
These figures are eloquent enough to make calculating the other cases unnecessary.
The results for the city of Barcelona (pp. 7-8) indicate that sociological factors do not have a significant influence on the rates of infection, but if we see a clear relationship with the 5G coverage map, which added to the 4G coverage, gives us a correlation between mobile coverage and the proportion of cases of coronavirus. If more data were available, this study should be extended to other cities.
38 thoughts on “Study Shows Direct Correlation between 5G Networks and “Coronavirus” Outbreaks”
Yes, but the “cases” are meaningless results of a fraudulent test(pcr). And fraudulent relabeling of cause of death or sickness from prior diseases or co-morbidities.
Yes, the added radiation will have a detrimental effect on health…people will die sooner because of it, but there is so much other toxicity in the environment and now they have the excuse to inject it into people directly, and it may interact with the 5g–graphene oxide.
What’s coming is not going to be pretty or fun.
Thank you very much for the article.
Several very important things are not considered in this study:
1. In order to apply the rate of sickness per 1000 inhabitants, it is necessary that each sick person be tested
The tests are quite expensive and not in all countries they were used en masse, not all patients are tested – this is why there is a “border” effect
2. In order to unambiguously judge what a person is sick with, the test must be adequate
Covid has never been isolated and its genetic sequence is not known!
Like all other viruses – this is just fiction, there is not a single study showing their involvement in disease!
The tests use an invented genetic sequence taken from the head, which means that the test shows more clouds than some necessary information
3. In Russia, during the 1994 revolution, the death rate increased by 10 times in the population, without war and murders, without any virus and infections!
Fear exacerbates disease! See – “Fear of Terrorist Attack Could Trigger Mass Psychogenic Illness” (https://file.wikileaks.org/file/dhs-mass-psychogenic-illness-2006.pdf)
“Fear of death” provokes lung disease! See German New Medicine – BIOLOGICAL SPECIAL PROGRAMS – LUNGS (https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/lungs.html)
4. In Russia, even those who died from injuries and accidents were recorded as patients with covid
5. Thus, it is better to take not statistics on covid, but overall mortality or deaths from pneumonia, this will give better results
I listened to an interview to Payeras in Spanish, and turns out the above is an initial draft that someone scooped into social media, Payeras was quite upset about it, because the study changed over time with better and more refined data, although stopping of course to hear any PCR garbage
and later he was seeing things so clearly that did claim causation, however in tandem with flu shots and iatrogenia (hospital mis-care roughly), he found tremendous correlation with those too, probably with some succession
meaning, it strongly appears there were something in the flu shots, than blast from towers appear to activate it, then you go to hospital and you are finished off
he doesnt deny other relative minor factors like the effect of mass fear etc
he is quite an amusing scientist, who also discovered “the Dali code”, and make fun of effects such as “the border effect”, whereby the “virus” apparently respect borders and attacks very diferently
after the draft above helpful things happened, like 5G was switched off in Switzerland, and data was striking
Incredible! But not at all surprising. What an diabolically ingenious plan they created! I should like to see the follow-up information! Do you have a link?
You know that magnet that sticks to you after you’ve been jabbed? Yeah… – https://radiopatriot.net/2021/07/08/you-know-that-magnet-that-sticks-to-you-after-youve-been-jabbed-yeah/
What is Graphene Oxide and will it kill you? – https://radiopatriot.net/2021/07/09/what-is-graphene-oxide-and-will-it-kill-you/
Remote regulation of glucose homeostasis in mice using genetically encoded nanoparticles – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894538/
Bidirectional electromagnetic control of the hypothalamus regulates feeding and metabolism – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894494/
These studies use the same substances as in modern vaccines!
Thank you Aleksandr, for your wise commentary and for sharing these important links!
Thank you for your work. Do you think orgonite is good against EMF ? and specially 5 G ?
No, it does not help lower radiation levels.
·Dirty Electricity: Electrification and the Diseases of Civilization – Samuel Milham, MD, MPH
·Zapped: Why Your Cell Phone Shouldn’t Be Your Alarm Clock & 1,268 Ways to Outsmart the Hazards of Electronic Pollution – Anne Louise Gittleman
·Are Wireless Devices Safe? – Jeanice Barcelo
·The Spinning Magnet: The Force That Created the Modern World – and Could Destroy It by Alanna Mitchell
·Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier
·Crystallizing Public Opinion by Edward Bernays
·The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind by Gustave Le Bon
·About behaviorism by B. F. Skinner
·The Age of Surveillance Capitalism by Shoshana Zuboff
·The Dangers of 5G by Claudia Drake
·Radiation Nation: The Fallout of Modern Technology by Daniel T. DeBaun and Ryan P. DeBaun
·Cancer and EMF Radiation: How to Protect Yourself from the Silent Carcinogen of Electropollution by Brandon LaGreca
·Disconnect: The Truth about Mobile-phone Radiation, what the Industry Has Done to Hide It, and how to Protect Your Family by Devra Davis
·Hidden Dangers 5G: How Governments, Telecom and Electric Power Utilities Suppress the Truth about the Known Hazards of Electro-magnetic Field Radiation by Jerry G. Flynn
·EMF*D: 5G, Wi-Fi & Cell Phones: Hidden Harms and How to Protect Yourself by Joseph Mercola
·Death by 5G: An Advanced Guide to Population Reduction Techniques by Louise Steele
·Earthing: The Most Important Health Discovery Ever? By Clinton Ober, Martin Zucker, and Stephen Sinatra
The proof is just sitting quietly in books and scientific papers…
Indeed the proof is everywhere once you become willing to see. Thanks for sharing these sources!
As a layman I wonder if the 5G effects are supposed to be the ‘covid effects’, what about places without 5G? What produces those effects there?
4G LTE — and actually all wireless technologies — can produce devastating health effects. What we are seeing is various symptoms of radiation sickness. Not all of it is being caused by 5G. Alot of is being caused by 3G and 4G frequencies and radiation.
Then one must ask why the ‘covid’ outbreak happened as a wave only now when 3 and 4G are around for many years.
…..two considerations, Deva – an unprecedented extent of sustained (and PRECISE) exposures, from multiple sources produced such conditions (as Arthur Firstenberg notes, CLOSELY paralleling an unintentional pandemic dubbed a century-plus ago, ‘The Spanish Flu’ – which it was NEITHER…..)
Indeed – and I have quoted Arthur in an article on this site entitled “Is COVID-19″ a Cover-up for Radiation Sickness?“. My research indicates there is no such thing as a virus. It’s a complete medical fabrication used to promote their toxic vaccines and cover-up what is really causing all the illness — technologically produced radiation and frequencies.
I have a question about all this and if anyone has an opinion, I’d really like to hear it. Over the last year when my teen daughter burns thru all our shared data, AT&T throttles our internet speed down, to where sometimes I can’t even do an internet search. So my question is, could it be possible that the cell phone providers can crank up the 5G waves and get people, or people who are electromagnetic sensitive sick and then turn the 5G back down. Like after the protesters not wearing masks and msm saying there going to be another outbreak..and sure enough we’re seeing a total spike in Covid cases now.
Let me know if anyone has an input on this.
Steven, I personally think this is very possible and also that they can use the smart meters on people’s homes to seriously harm and injure the people inside the houses. The smart meters can also be used to ignite houses. This is all weaponry and can they definitely target people with these devices.
…..as MANY of you may be aware by now, Elana Freeland in her book ‘Under An Ionized Sky’ goes into GREAT detail as to how MULTIPLE instruments, networks exist which could be used to agonize BOTH existing biologics and those piezoelectrically engineered (my own facilitating model) to optimize transmission, mutability…..
Jim – I have not yet read this book. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
It’s my true pleasure – but, must extend apologies, too; a VERY tough read, toughest I’VE ever had for sure…..what she reveals, is genuinely TERRIFYING 🙁
5g is first implemented where the density of population is high. COVID clusters are mostly located where the density of population is high. So there is no surprise of finding a strong correlation, because they share the same cause : high density of population
I wouldn’t be quick to dismiss that, if that were true then Cairo and Mexico city would be the highest infected by far.
However one thing that goes against the 5g tower explanation is the situation in Germany which has one of the highest 5g concentration but was doing fairly well in this crisis.. it could be that they have people who have configured these towers to have more safe configuration/profiles as the Germans usually are not dupes and have the expertise to do this kind of thing right.
Verizon 5G launched in NYC on Sept. 26, 2019. Only a few months before this Covid thing showed up there. Definitely hit hard in NYC. Connection? I don’t know. But interesting.
Thank you for this! As a journalis trying to raise awareness of this since March, I was ridiculed and dubbed a conspiracy theorists, tin hatter, etc. PLEASE keep on with the research!
no data about frequencies, impact on micro or macro organismes
no real arguments
no discussion about people circulation, about tourism, about economic relation
only nice pictures
sorry, but it is for children
I recommend that you check the Sutro tower study regarding the increased risk and incidences of childhood cancers by vicinity to the Sutro tower.
Thank you Aldo!
This is a more than edifying study, even impressive, mainly because it has the merit of corroborating the highlighted factor with other factors, the influence of which undoubtedly hardens it.
It also makes a well-grounded and valuable generalization: if, until now, the influence of radiation generated by various wireless devices on various organs of the human body, especially the brain, has been shown, now the study of their harmful influence is extensive and even in-depth, because it draws attention to some genetic aspects.
However, it seems that there are counterexamples or – most likely – those states that seem to contradict those highlighted in this research have not been the subject of study. Brazil, where there is now an explosion of Pandemic, can be such an example. The very fact that the epidemic broke out there later is an almost as strong counterexample, because the 5G effect would have been simultaneous.
It would probably be more correct and valid in the long run for the 5G influence to be integrated among all the other factors “guilty” of current developments, factors such as environmental damage and, implicitly, the resources that people use, both for industry and for consumption, but also some social and psychosocial factors, not to mention cultural ones.
The latter factors are also essential and deserve separate and detailed treatment, especially as they were the ones that determined the feature and size (finally, the efficiency) of the social measures to the pandemic.
A personal opinion: I believe that the pandemic and the human capacity to react to the pandemic have shown that small and medium-sized systems are more viable, and a mistake or a sum/suite of small mistakes, propagated on a global scale, can be equivalent to a catastrophe.
In general we should think and build on a human scale and only science should look for healthy variants of the future, looking even at cosmic spatial and temporal possibilities (from where these fateful radiations now return), because – it is clear – technology can achieve almost anything science discovers.
Have you published this important paper (translation)? I would like to reference it in a paper that I am writing. Kindly send me the full reference, if possible. Thank you!
Beverly – you will have to ask the author of the paper if it has been published anywhere else. I honestly don’t know. To my knowledge, so far, all three papers that have been published on this topic (see here, here, and here) are not being accepted for publication in journals. That’s because the journals are likely controlled by the same monied interests that run the wireless industry.
I have been looking for a study like this for ages and found you on an African publication. thegrapevine.co.ug No they would not want to publish these papers. They certainly do not want this out there. On social media platforms anything that says Covid and 5G together is being censored big time. Then again a lot of other things are being censored as well. I have some friends that will pass it on for sure. Great work. Here are some links you might want to look into. Seem no one can find the anywhere that Virus is real. There is no Gold standard for it. It has not been isolated. PCR is not meant to identify a virus to start with. Make sure you keep a copy of everything you have in a file somewhere. Some thing can vanish and some get changed. So screen shots are always a good idea as well. There is a post there about the World bank. They were importing and exporting test kits for Covid 19 in 2017 and 2018. As soon as people went looking for it the World Bank changed it. That was just about a week or so ago. Some have screen shots and one person found an archived spot with it in there. Bless their dear hearts. This is an awesome find. Thank You. Big Hugs for you.
Thanks so much William!
Was the output intensity of the 5G taken into consideration in this study?
Has it gone up to 300ghtz anywhere yet?
I don’t know and I don’t think the have used the 300 GHz frequency yet.
Hello, iam not directly replied for this topic. Was just the easiest way to message you. I’m looking for a post from about a year ago that you don’t have anymore; (5g/is-the-coronavirus-actually-microwave-illness/) I would like to have it.
You can email it to me.
Hi Uladis – it is still on the site but I’ve changed the title of the article. Here is the link: https://radiationdangers.com/2020/01/31/is-covid-19-a-cover-up-for-radiation-sickness/ Hope this helps!
I am completely shocked by the effects of 5G can have on the human body unborn children I can understand now why the Government allowed 5G to roll out when our country was completely in locked down many of us have signed a petition to stop 5G until it’s been tested of the harmful effect on humans. I would be very grateful a letter be addressed of these dangers the harmful effects to children and adults and unborn children.