For Life on Earth: Worldwide Web of Life

by Claire Edwards

25 Nov 2020
Originally published in AEVA magazine, UK, Summer/Autumn 2020/Edition 5

* * * * * * * * * *

The grass smells fresh. The sun warms my face. It feels so good to finally be released from “lockdown” and go for a picnic. I hear Chris and Billie talking at the water’s edge. Bees buzz among the flowers nearby. Ellie lies beside me, looking up at the sky.

“Look at all the birds, mummy!” I open my eyes to see a flock of birds flying in formation above us. The bird in front changes direction and the flock instantly follows.

“How do they know how to all fly together?”

“It’s electrical.”

Ellie knows about “lektrissity” since Billie, older by a year, got a book about it for his birthday two weeks ago. We read how electricity governs our bodies and the earth – it’s everywhere.

“They can sense the earth’s magnetic field with their beaks and see it with their eyes. And their feathers are like antennas and can sense electricity. And they use something called “magnetite” in their heads to connect to the earth’s fields so they know where to fly.”[1],[2]

“Do we have ‘mag-tite’, too?”

“Yes, we do, behind the top of our noses.”[3]

“So why’ve we got a satnav (GPS system) in the car, then?”

I laugh. “Because we forgot how to use our magnetite!”

Ellie absorbs this as she gazes at the bees visiting the flowers. Finally she asks, “How do the bees know where to find the flowers with the most pollen?”

“They can see electric fields from the flowers. They pick up the pollen through magnetism. The bees have a positive charge and the flowers a negative one.[4] Do you remember that from when we were playing with the magnets? They attract each other.”

“Yes”, says Ellie. “Do we have ‘lektrik feelz, too?”

“Yes, we do. Our whole body is electrical. Our bones, muscles, brain and blood.[5],[6] Our heart has a huge electrical field. It goes out 4 metres around us.”[7]

Ellie lays her hand on my bump. “Will Baby be able to feel our heart love feelz?”

I smile. “Yes, Ellie. Baby will be able to feel how much we love it! When we are with someone, our electrical field reaches out to theirs and they mingle.”

Ellie is silent, thinking. “Gran couldn’t feel our heart love feelz during the lockdown, mummy. We couldn’t hug her.” She looks sad.

I push her hair back off her forehead. “She was sad, too, that she couldn’t hug you.”

“What about if you’re cross with someone?”

“Unfortunately, people feel that, too.”

“So we mustn’t ever be cross!” Ellie makes fists. She looks at the flowers and asks, “Do the plants know when we’re cross?”

“Yes, they do. There was a man who invented a machine to see if people were telling lies. It works with the sweat on your skin and measures electricity. He wondered if the machine could also measure what plants feel so he connected it up to a leaf. Then he wondered what the plant would do if he burned it with a match. As soon as he thought that, his machine went wild. The plant knew what he was thinking.”[8]

“How could it know?

“Because our brains are electrical and our thoughts are electrical signals and the plant could sense them.”

“Can the trees do that, too?”

“Yes, the trees’ root systems send out electrical signals that travel underground. When the trees sense trouble, they warn the other trees.”[9]

“When that man was cutting down the trees in our street, were they warning the other trees then?” She looks pained.

“I’m sure they were.”

“Poor trees! I wish they could run away!”

“They would if they could, from all that screaming noise.”

Ellie looks hard at her toes. “Where does their ‘lektrissity come from?”

“It comes from the earth’s electric circuit.[10] Currents pass through the trees and it’s the same for humans. The current comes through our head and our body and out through our feet. [11]

“So everything’s connected by ‘lektrissity?

“Yes. The whole earth and all life on it communicate electrically, including us.”

“It’s like the Internet of nature!”, Ellie exclaims in one of her flashes of insight.

“That’s right, Ellie! It’s a natural Internet that supports life. The WiFi for the computer Internet is not natural – it’s like us all living inside a microwave oven.”[12],[13],[14]

“Yuck!” exclaims Ellie. WiFi’s cooking us!”

“Well, it’s almost exactly the same frequency, 2.4 GHz and a microwave oven uses 2.45 GHz, so I suppose it is.”[15]

“Is that why my cress died? Because it was cooked?”, she asks indignantly. Ellie had tried an experiment she’d read about in Billie’s book. On the windowsill in full sun she’d grown some cress, which grew strongly, and some next to the WiFi router, which didn’t germinate at all.[16]

“Yes. Plants need the natural light of the sun. They can’t survive on artificial electrical fields, which aren’t native to the earth so they kill anything living. Only little, tiny electric currents can be good for us. They can help our body heal.”[17]

Shouting erupts nearby as two kids start fighting over a mobile phone. The parents look up irritably from their own phones to condemn the squabble.

“Why are they fighting?”, asks Ellie.

“Those phones are addictive.[18] Once kids start using them, they can’t leave them alone. And phones stimulate your body’s electrical system and make you stressed.”[19],[20]

“Poor them!” says kind Ellie. “Maybe they don’t understand ‘lektrik feelz.”

“I don’t think they do, darling.”

“We should ‘splain them”, suggests Ellie.

Chris and Billie collapse next to us, breathless and laughing.

“Salmon cells contain magnetite so they know where they’re going”, announces Billie knowledgeably.[21] Daddy told me.”

“Mummy told me the birds have mag-tite, too!”, Ellie competes.

Chris pours water for everyone. We drink and the kids decide to swim.

Chris watches them go. “Billie’s going through an electrical phase since getting that book. He asks so many questions I can’t keep up. He dragged me out last night to look for Musk’s Starlink satellites.”

I laugh. “So does Ellie. Did you see them?”

“No. We had to go indoors and look on the Internet.” He slips his hand into mine. “You know, I worry what they’re going to do to the global electrical circuit”, his tone serious now.


“We found out that there are proposals for about 100,000 of them and they’re going to blanket the whole earth in microwave radiation.[22] It’s alien to the planet and to our biology. They say we’re already 1 quintillion times above natural background radiation, and that’s before all these satellites beaming down signals on us. It’s like boiling frogs.”[23],[24], [25]

All languor gone, I sit up, my stomach knotted.

“And that’s not all”, he says, “They’re putting these antennas – thousands of tiny ones together that make these beams like lasers – on street lights and street furniture, right outside your bedroom window, under manhole covers … You won’t know where all these beams are coming at you from. Imagine being out with the baby and stopping to talk to a friend while the buggy’s over one of these manhole covers.”[26]

I gasp. “Has any of this been tested for health or safety?”

“Apparently not.[27] And many experts are predicting a 5G catastrophe.”[28],[29],[30]

“Mamma mia! What’s it going to do to us and all of nature?”[31]

“Scientists and doctors who know about these things are seriously alarmed. Thousands of them have signed about 60 petitions to stop it all.”[32]


“Yes, all this wireless technology and this new 5G.”

“Why’s it not stopping, then?”

“Governments are not listening. There’s too much money involved – 5G is worth 12 trillion dollars to the world economy, apparently.”[33]

“I thought the precautionary principle was part of EU law?”[34]

It is. There have been several major, official reports warning about wireless technology or 5G or calling for the precautionary principle, but they’re ignoring them.”[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40],[41]

“What about these safety guidelines we keep hearing about?”[42],[43],[44]

“They’re a joke. They’re not even legal limits.[45] They’re put together by a self-appointed private group of scientists, not a doctor among them, and endorsed illegitimately by the UN as if they’d been drawn up by an official international body.[46] In order to start breaching those, you’d need to have around 666 thousand antennas around your house.[47] It’s like saying you care about road safety in residential areas and setting speed limits at 20 million miles an hour.”[48]

Our eyes meet, full of worry. The kids shriek with laughter and we turn to watch them jumping onto and falling off the inflatable boat.

“We got rid of our mobile phones and cabled our computers,[49] but that’s not going to stop all this radiation getting to us from elsewhere. Can’t we get something to protect ourselves?”

“Well, you can get these pricey gadgets that are supposed to protect you, but almost none of them protect you against 5G and these beams, apparently. You could shield your walls with lead paint, but then you’d be living inside a Faraday cage and that cuts you off from the Schumann resonances of the earth so it’s unhealthy, and even dangerous if you then generate electrical fields inside.”[50],[51]

“Anyway, even if you could shield yourself, you’re going to get zapped when you leave the house to go to work or school,” I muse.[52]

“And how are you going to shield the pollinators so you still have food?[53] You’re not going to be shielding the ionosphere, either. Five million watts coming from each satellite will get magnified there and play havoc with life on the planet.”[54]

My brow furrows. “I wonder if the wireless technology and new 5G installations have anything to do with this coronavirus.”[55],[56]

“Billie’s book says that electromagnetic fields suppress the immune system.[57],[58],[59] And people are saying that the symptoms bear a strong resemblance to those of exposure to electromagnetic radiation.”[60]

“I wonder if there’s any connection with the reports of birds dying all over the planet.”[61],[62],[63],[64],[65]

“Did you see that video of birds attacking an antenna in Australia?”[66]

“No. Do you think they know how dangerous they are?”

“Well, animals sense electrical fields where we don’t. There are lots of stories of animals leaving the area before tsunamis hit. Human bodies are found afterwards, but not animals’.”[67]

“A beekeeper told me that if he goes to his hives with a mobile phone in his pocket, the bees swarm and attack it. Another one said that he makes maps of the antenna locations and never puts hives between them, otherwise the bees get aggressive.”[68]

“The same with storks near antennas. They start fighting.”[69]

Chris stares at my bump. When he raises his eyes to mine I see tears in them.[70]

“What’s the matter, love?”, I ask gently.


“I didn’t want to tell you this.”

“What? Tell me.”

“It’s about when the first 66 satellites went up in 1999 and 2001.”[71] He hesitates and I squeeze his hand.

“The death rate went up in America by 4-5% in the following two weeks. And homing pigeons never came back. Breeders said it was unprecedented. Lots of people lost their sense of smell, had nausea, nosebleeds, heart palpitations, ringing in the ears, respiratory problems, stabbing pains. And there were catastrophic losses of race horse foals, and horses with strange eye problems.”[72]

I stare at him in horror. “Foals have been dying in Thailand, just after 5G was switched on.[73] Surely someone must be looking into this.”

“As I said, all the warnings are being ignored.[74] Mind you, Nigeria and Slovenia have adopted moratoria on 5G.[75],[76] So have a lot of towns, cities and counties in many countries around the world.[77] Switzerland has refused permission for 5G antennas to be used until they’re proved safe, but that doesn’t stop the telecommunications companies from using 4G LTE, which is just as dangerous.”[78]

“Aren’t the environmental NGOs or the green parties doing anything?”

“People keep contacting them and telling them to get involved in stopping wireless technology, but they don’t want to know. Maybe that’s to do with the 5G-pushers hijacking the term “ecosystem” to describe their technology.[79] The only green parties I’ve heard of who have spoken out were in Italy and Switzerland. Although individual politicians all over the world have expressed concern.[80] And now Catholic bishops are speaking up for humanity, too.”[81],[82]

“Why don’t they realise that we’re co-dependent with the earth?”[83],[84]

“D’you remember what it says in the bible? ‘God gave man dominion over the animals.’ People think we’re separate from nature.”

“Only in the West. In other parts of the world, people see themselves as part of nature. Japanese tend to see themselves as organic, like a plant. It’s only Westerners who talk about humans as machines.”[85]

Chris murmurs assent.

“It’s absurd!” I add. “Even little Ellie realises that we’re all part of an Internet of nature.”

“Does she? Well, she’s right. It’s all a magnificent dance of connection. Without the earth’s natural electrical fields, humans and nature would probably all be dead.”[86]

“Why are they saturating the planet with microwave radiation, then? It’s totally illegal to expose everyone to this environmental toxin, especially children and foetuses.”[87],[88]

“It’s for the Internet of Things, and people say that’s for technocracy, social crediting, and Agenda 21/2030.[89],[90] “Smart” cities, self-driving cars, military weapons.[91] Did you know Musk is working with the military now?”[92]

“It doesn’t surprise me. I suppose that’s connected with NATO declaring space a domain of warfare last December.”[93],[94]

“What? This is madness. People have to be told!”

“Who’s going to tell them? The media all seem to be owned by the telecommunications companies. Even the BBC’s in bed with them![95] And the social media companies delete the accounts of people who talk about wireless technology and 5G and any connections to coronavirus.[96] And now it looks like the EU is taking measures to bring in law enforcement and the security services to harass and jail people  worried about their health under 5G who try to sound the alarm.”[97]

“What’s going on? Are we in Soviet Russia now?” [98]

“Closer than you might think. A German medical lawyer and a Swiss doctor were shut away in psychiatric hospitals for questioning this pandemic quarantine.”[99],[100] And Italian police sedated a protester who was questioning the quarantine in his local community.[101]

“We’re going to have to start talking to the people we know.” Chris caressed my bump. “It’s down to us to make sure the baby has a safe world to live in.”

“And the birds and bees and trees!”

Billie and Ellie run up noisily. “We’re going to play badminton with those kids”, says Billie.

“We’ll get them away from those phones and tell them they’re not healthy”, confides Ellie. “I’ll ‘splain them about the bees and the flowers.” We watch them run off and start to play. I see those two kids smiling for the first time today.

“Billie and Ellie seem to have beaten us to it.” Chris and I share a smile.

“Good for them! Gran’s birthday present’s been worth its weight in gold.”

“She’s educated us, too.”

Chris pours wine for him and water for me. A gentle breeze stirs. We clink glasses.

“Here’s to Gran!

“And her great choice of kids’ books!”

“Are you being ironic?” I’m never sure when Chris is joking.

“No!”, he assures me, suppressing a grin. “I’m grateful I know all this stuff now.”

I lift an eyebrow.

He raises both hands in the air, protesting innocence. “Honestly! Now that we know, we can start doing something about it.”[102]


Photo credits—Unsplash

  1. Liana Mikah.
  2. Jeremy Bishop.
  3. Adrienne Holton.
  4. Limor Zellermayer.
  5. Limor Zellermayer.
  6. Xavier Mouton.




[1] Sander Funneman. Electric Ecosystem. 2020. Available at

[2] Ulrich Warnke. Bees, Birds and Mankind: Destroying Nature by Electrosmog. 2009. Available at “Electromagnetic fields therefore have a role to play in formation flying of birds as well. They serve as orientation and navigation aid and determine the position of a single animal in the flock. Depending especially on wing width, wing span and body length, our observations and calculations show that the biophysical relationships influence the species-typical V-formation flying of flocks. Computer calculations of the flight order allow us to predict natural formation flights. And photographic records, vice-versa, also agree well with computer simulations. The observations demonstrate a unique information and orientation system of the animal kingdom. But they also explain why this is destroyed by the interference of technically generated electrical and magnetic fields. … Birds also sense high frequency transmitters very clearly and belong to the group of animal species that reacts very sensitively to electromagnetic fields. They absorb the impinging energy particularly intensively via the feathers of their wings…. birds’ feathers are semi-conducting and have piezo- and pyroelectrical properties. These body parts transform pulse-modulated high frequency into mechanical acoustic oscillation frequency. One of its important functions is the dielectric sensitivity to electromagnetic fields in the microwave region. … The presence of magnetite particles in the nano-range was shown in the abdomen of bees and the head region of birds. Through ferromagnetic resonance, magnetite is an excellent receiver of microwave radiated fields in the 0.5 to 10.0 GHz frequency range. In this way, pulsed microwave energy is transformed into acoustical vibrations (magneto-acoustic effect).”

[3] Funneman. 144 & 146. “Humans also appear to have a minuscule crystal, magnetite, which is located in the bone structure between the eyes, just behind the nose. … [T]he eyes also potentially connect us to the earth’s magnetic field by means of EMST [electromagnetic signal transference].”

[4] Funneman. 27-29. “Honeybees are the most important working animals, after cows and pigs, as they pollinate 80 percent of wild plants and crops, ranging from apples, pears, rapeseed, , peaches and raspberries to clover, linseed, beans, peas and cucumbers. … not only do bees collect electromagnetic charges when they fly, but … flowers, rooted in soil, in turn build up an electromagnetic charge when they gently sway in the wind. … all bees communicate by means of EMST: radiation, frequencies and impulses. … both plants and bees have an electric glow that is invisible to humans. When radiating that glow, plants emit weak, negatively charged electric fields, whereas bees become positively charged when they fly through the air=, flapping their wings up and down at high speed. How do these electromagnetic charges between flowers and bees develop? Well, by polarisation. This involves four ingredients: bees, flowers, the planet and the electromagnetic field of the earth.”

[5] Funneman. 137. “So all the nerves, bones and muscles in the human body are conductors of electricity. However, the body is resistant to electric charges. This is because our body is made up of cells. In this context, cells are small packages of salt water, surrounded by membranes made of fats, oils and proteins. Oils are very poor conductors. Thus, although the presence of salt water allows for an electric current in the human body, the membranes act as barriers and offer a natural resistance. What is a resistance? A resistance is something that electricity cannot easily pass through.”

[6] Video. Jerry Tennant: Healing is Voltage. (48 mins.)

[7] Funneman. 140-141. “The radiation field of the heart is even 50 times stronger than the field of the brain. … [E]lectrical energy in the body … has a signal effect that connects everything in the body to everything by means of EMST. … The field of the heart can be detected up to more than four metres from the body. The study also shows that the electromagnetic field of heart energy can affect others. A parent holding a baby surrounds the baby with the energy field of the parent’s heart.”

[8] Dawson Church. The Genie in Your Genes: Epigenetic Medicine and the New Biology of Intention. 15 May 2014. Funneman. 149. Electric currents experience less resistance when the surface of the skin becomes sweaty; the salty consistency of the sweat is an excellent conductor. Lie detectors use this function.”

[9] Funneman. 131. “The trees in the forest are connected via an underground network and work together with useful fungi that form an intricate network of small, threadlike strands between tree roots. … Trees exchange chemical, hormonal and slow pulsating electrical signals via an underground network. Messages sent from tree to tree are often distress signals warning of drought, disease or insect attacks. Other trees will change their behaviour or adapt their defences to prepare for the upcoming battle after receiving the messages. Now, even electrical signals are measured and recorded from trees that are being chopped down. The trees send these signals to other trees in the area.”

[10] Video. Earth’s Atmospheric Global Electric Circuit at the Frontiers of Earth System Science. 20 November 2013. (7 mins.) Available at

[11]Arthur Firstenberg. “Planetary Emergency”. 14 May 2018. Available at “The global electrical circuit flows through the earth, up to the sky in thunderstorms, through the ionosphere, and back down to earth through the atmosphere and through our bodies. The current enters our bodies through the top of our head, circulates through our acupuncture meridians, and reenters the earth through our feet. In addition to direct current, it contains 8 Hz, 14 Hz, 20 Hz, 26 Hz, and 33 Hz components. These ELF frequencies are the Schumann resonances, and are identical to the brain wave frequencies of every animal. It also contains VLF [Very Low] frequencies. These are generated by lightning, vary seasonally, and regulate our annual biorhythms. We pollute this circuit at our peril.” Funneman. P 119-120 & 122. “Plants and trees are not only the lungs of the planet, but also play a role in electrically charging the atmosphere. The positive and negative ion concentrations above forests are twice as high compared to grasslands. … [T]he earth is negatively charged and the atmosphere positive. Through trees, the atmosphere can naturally discharge itself again and again.”

[12] Arthur Firstenberg. “The Hidden Dangers Of Wireless & Cell Phone Radiation.” Interview. 6 April 2018. Available at “Well, we make the analogy to a microwave oven. As long as the microwave oven is shielded and the door is shut, it’s useful. You can put food in it, it’ll cook it. You don’t want the door open while you’re cooking your food because then it will cook you. What a cell phone is, is a small microwave oven with the door open. It’s an uncontained source of microwave radiation that you are putting next to your head.”

[13] Funneman. 120. “[T]here is a fundamental difference between the electricity that energizes our bodies and the electricity we use to light our cities at night. The electricity in the wiring in walls is carried by fast electrons, while the slow electricity passing through the plant and animal kingdom is carried by ions.”

[14] The Journal of Natural Science. William P. Kopp. “Effects of Microwave on Humans”. 1998. Available at

“Exposure to microwave emissions had an unpredictably negative effect upon the general biological welfare of humans, too. This was not discovered until the Russians experimented with highly sophisticated equipment, and discovered that a human did not even need to ingest the material substance of the microwaved food substances: that even exposure to the energy-field itself was sufficient to cause such adverse side-effects that the use of any such microwave apparatus was forbidden in 1976 by Soviet state law.”

[15] Wired. “Why Everything Wireless Is 2.4 GHz.” Available at 7 September 2010. “You live your life at 2.4 GHz. Your router, your cordless phone, your Bluetooth earpiece, your baby monitor and your garage opener all love and live on this radio frequency, and no others. Why? The answer is in your kitchen.”

[16] Video. Wi Fi test in School on Plants Growth. 20 November 2019. Available at (4.5 mins.)

[17] Robert O. Becker. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life. 1985. 292. “Short exposures to stress aren’t necessarily harmful and may even be healthy. In fact, the Soviet work on microwave stress has disclosed a brief period of increased immune-system competence at very low intensities (under 10 microwatts). However, when an organism must face a continual or repeated stress, the response system enters the chronic phase, during which resistance declines below normal and eventually becomes exhausted. Several well-known diseases, such as peptic ulcer and hypertension, result directly from this stage, but the most important result is a decrease in the body’s ability to fight infection and cancer.”

[18] Australia: Environment and Communities Safe from Radiation. Letter to government Chief Medical Officer. 15 April 2020. Available at “At the first synapse in the spinal cord, there is a release of endogenous opioids. The release of endogenous opioids occurs in at least two other spots in the brain. The subsequent release of endogenous opioids into the blood stream spreads these chemicals throughout the body, and certainly is adequate for explaining why pain relief can result from MMW [millimetre wave] exposures. The involvement of endogenous opioids in MMW therapy is verified by the fact that the beneficial effect of MMW therapy is completely abolished upon the administration of naloxone, a general opioid inhibitor. … In addition, like tobacco, 5G mm waves have the potential to create dependency and be addictive by design.”

[19] Reykjavik Appeal on Wireless Radiation in Schools: Children, Screen Time and Wireless Radiation – International Conference in Reykjavik. 24 February 2017. “Results from the [Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]’s PISA performance surveys in reading and mathematics show decreasing results in countries that have invested most in introducing computers in school. Multitasking, too many hours in front of a screen, less time for social contacts and physical activities with risk for aches in neck and back, overweight, sleep problems, and information technology (IT)- addiction are some of the known risks and side effects of IT. They stand in marked contrast to the often claimed, but largely unproven possible benefits.”

[20] Council of Europe Resolution 1815 (2011) “[I]dentifies young people and children as particularly vulnerable groups and suggests that there could be extremely high human and economic costs if early warnings are neglected. … “The European Environment Agency requests that EU Member States do more to inform citizens about the risks of EMF exposure, especially to children”. Available at

[21] Funneman. 106. Some cells in the salmon contain the famous magnetite crystals that create a cellular compass. [B]ecause they are constantly drawn to the lines of the earth’s geomagnetic field, they exert certain forces on the cell membrane when the salmon deviates from its path through the water. … The downside is that [this] also makes them sensitive to artificial EMFs. A 1980 study demonstrated that salmon and eels suffer from heart rhythm disorders as a result of exposure to specific artificial frequencies.”

[22] Arstechnica. “Bankrupt OneWeb Seeks License for 48,000 Satellites, Even More Than SpaceX.” 27 May 2020. Available at “OneWeb asks FCC for expanded license as it prepares to exit bankruptcy. SpaceX and OneWeb have asked for US permission to launch tens of thousands of additional satellites into low Earth orbit. SpaceX’s application to launch 30,000 satellites—in addition to the nearly 12,000 it already has permission for—is consistent with SpaceX’s previously announced plans for Starlink. … Other providers such as Telesat (1,671 satellites), Kepler (360 satellites), and Viasat (288 satellites) filed applications for smaller low-Earth-orbit constellations. Mangata Networks filed an application for 791 satellites in medium-Earth orbits.”

[23] Firstenberg. “Planetary Emergency”. Available at

[24] Professor Olle Johansson. “To Bee, or not to Bee, that is the Five “G” Question.” 25 May 2019. Available at “[You often] hear representatives of various authorities declare that if we are just staying below the current guideline recommendations (given as µW/m2; 1800 MHz) of 9,000,000 µW/m2 – ICNIRP’s (1998) and WHO’s recommendation for Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and many other countries, and 10,000,000 µW/m2 for the USA, then everything is fine. But the natural background during normal cosmic activities is only 0.000001-0.00000000001 µW/m2, thus the maximum allowed exposure load on the citizens is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger. Would we trust anyone proposing that we can withstand a 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger outdoor air pressure, or a 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 times higher indoor temperature?” [µW/m2 = microwatts per metre squared]

[25] Funneman. P 177-178. [T]he proposed transmission of GHz frequencies from new satellites in the [ionosphere] will probably cause unknown physical, biological, mental or emotional effects. … [N]o long and independent research has been conducted into the impact of new GHz EMFs [electromagnetic fields] on biological materials. Also, as far as is known, no research has been done into the impact of those effects on the natural planetary background radiation.”

[26] Claire Edwards. “The 5G Dementors Meet the 4G Zombie Apocalypse.” Available at

[27] Video. US Senator Blumenthal Raises Concerns on 5G Wireless Technology Health Risks at Senate Hearing. 8 February 2019. Available at (5 mins.) US Senator Blumenthal definitively establishes that no safety studies have been done on 5G.

[28] Naren, Elhence A, Chamola V, Guizani M. “Electromagnetic Radiation due to Cellular, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth technologies: How safe are we?” IEEE Access. Vol. 8. (Retracted). 27 February 2020. Available at “If 5G networks are deployed without careful analysis of expected exposure levels, almost all people in the area of coverage may be exposed to dangerous levels of PFD [power flux densities], the outcomes of which, in the near future, may turn out to be calamitous. … Different countries across the world adopt different RF EMR [radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation] exposure limits based on these considerations. For example, the United States adopts limits based only on thermal effects. Russia and China have taken non-thermal effects into account while determining their standards. Switzerland and Italy have taken precautionary measures to account for any adverse health effects which may be discovered in the future, and therefore adopt exposure limits even below non-thermal effects.”

[29] Martin L. Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Washington State University. “Letter to The Guardian newspaper, UK.”  30 July 2019. Available at “[T]he so-called ‘safety guidelines’ from ICNIRP, the EU, UK and Australian (which are identical to each other), as well as the similar US FCC and Canadian “safety guidelines” do not predict biological effects and therefore do not predict safety. … All assurances of safety made by the industry that are based on these “safety guidelines” are, therefore, fraudulent. …

“The second document is a list of 41 different statements written by scientists and/or physicians, each expressing high-level concern that the “safety guidelines” only consider thermal effects and do not take into account non-thermal effects. … [R]eview articles … document important health impacts of electromagnetic fields at levels well below safety guideline allowable exposures – a total of 9 different effects … as follows: 25 different reviews on lowered fertility in humans and in animals; 29 different reviews on neurological/ neuropsychiatric effects; 24 different reviews on three different effects on cellular DNA – effects known to produce mutations; 15 different reviews on apoptosis (programmed cell death) – important for producing both infertility and neurodegeneration; 25 different reviews on oxidative stress/free radical damage, important in causing most human chronic diseases; 15 different reviews on endocrine (that is hormonal) effects; 16 different reviews on excessive intracellular calcium (thought to cause almost all of the other effects); 39 different reviews on cancer causation;  9 different reviews on cardiac effects on the electrical control of the heart. …

“[S]ome of the most concerning effects produced by EMFs act cumulatively, producing progressively more severe effects with time of exposure to a particular type and intensity of exposure and as the effects become more severe, they become apparently irreversible. The consequence of this is that false claims of safety inevitably cause hundreds of millions of people to become severely and irreversibly affected.

“Chapter 4 discusses four reasons why children are much more severely impacted than are adults. Chapters 5 and 6 … describe the corruption of the science, in both Europe and the US. The … corruption has been so large and so consequential.

“… Swiss Re, the second largest re-insurance company in the world, expresses concern about the dangers of, and therefore liability for, 5G effects. The positions of insurance companies more generally have made it impossible to get insurance for 5G liability and that should tell you very clearly the views of insurance companies on the dangers of 5G.

“Because heating is the basis of the current safety guidelines and heating is mainly produced by the forces on singly charged groups in the aqueous parts of our cells and bodies, this predicts that the current safety guidelines may allow us to be exposed to EMFs that are approximately 7.2 million times too strong. [Emphasis added]

“The two cumulative effects that are of most concern to Prof. Pall are the neurological/ neuropsychiatric and the reproductive effects, both of which have high prevalence in our societies. Either of these alone can produce extinction. [emphasis added]…

“[W]e could well see a reproductive crash essentially to zero within about 5 years based on our current exposures, with some countries crashing much more rapidly. In either of these cases we will have no future. Of course, increasing exposures beyond our current exposures from 5G, further expansion of 4G, increased radar usage in cars and other exposures may be expected to produce much faster demise.”

[30] Ronald N. Kostoff, PhD, Research Affiliate, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology. “The Largest Unethical Medical Experiment in Human History”. 2020. Available at “This monograph describes the largest unethical medical experiment in human history: the implementation and operation of non-ionizing non-visible EMF radiation (hereafter called wireless radiation) infrastructure for communications, surveillance, weaponry, and other applications. It is unethical because it violates the key ethical medical experiment requirement for “informed consent” by the overwhelming majority of the participants.

“The monograph provides background on unethical medical research/experimentation, and frames the implementation of wireless radiation within that context. The monograph then identifies a wide spectrum of adverse effects of wireless radiation as reported in the premier biomedical literature for over seven decades. Even though many of these reported adverse effects are extremely severe, the true extent of their severity has been grossly underestimated.

“Most of the reported laboratory experiments that produced these effects are not reflective of the real-life environment in which wireless radiation operates. Many experiments do not include pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal, and most do not account for synergistic effects of other toxic stimuli acting in concert with the wireless radiation. These two additions greatly exacerbate the severity of the adverse effects from wireless radiation, and their neglect in current (and past) experimentation results in substantial under-estimation of the breadth and severity of adverse effects to be expected in a real-life situation. This lack of credible safety testing, combined with depriving the public of the opportunity to provide informed consent, contextualizes the wireless radiation infrastructure operation as an unethical medical experiment.”

[31] Funneman. 78 & 79. “The way bacteria and higher life forms evolve may well have its origin in the natural EMFs [electromagnetic fields] that develop from the interaction between the geomagnetic field and higher spheres. The selective window created by the geomagnetic field seem to inspire changes in the organisation of life. Artificial EMFs are not designed to cause evolution, however. They serve an economic purpose, not an evolutionary one. … [It’s a] question of whether global coverage by artificial EMFs also means global disconnection for the ecosystem.”

[32] Environmental Health Trust. Scientific Appeals by Scientists and Doctors and Experts on 5G and Wireless Antennas. Available at

[33] EDN. “5G: The Twelve Trillion Dollar Technology.” 3 May 2017. Available at

[34] Bonnor. Legal Opinion on Whether it Would Be in Contravention of Human Rights and Environmental Law to Establish the 5G-System in Denmark. 4 May 2019. Available at “The EU precautionary principle can currently be found in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), article 191, paragraph 2: ”Union policy on the environment shall aim at a high level of protection taking into account the diversity of situations in the various regions of the Union. It shall be based on the precautionary principle and on the principles that preventive action should be taken, …” According to the announcement of February 20th 2000 from the European Commission on the precautionary principle (9 – 10), it can be applied ”…where scientific evidence is insufficient, inconclusive or uncertain and there are indications through preliminary objective scientific evaluation that there are reasonable grounds for concern that the potentially dangerous effects on the environment, human, animal or plant health may be inconsistent with the chosen level of protection. …As it relates to the topic of this legal opinion, evocation of the principle would clearly be relevant in so far as it was assumed that there was no scientific certainty with regard to concluding that radiofrequen[cy] electromagnetic radiation inside the currently utilised limits, cf. item 2.1. above, would be damaging to the health of (in casu) birds, animals and plants encompassed by the directives [listed].”

[35] European Parliament. “5G Deployment: State of Play in Europe, USA and Asia.”  April 2019. Available at The report implicitly admits that 5G is a massive experiment, lamenting that “it is not possible to accurately simulate or measure 5G emissions in the real world” and stating that “complex interference effects … may result, especially in dense urban areas.”

[36] Austrian government report on health and safety of 5G. 8 March 2020. Available at (German).

The authors invoked the precautionary principle when they published their health report on 5G commissioned by the Austrian government in August 2019.

[37]European Parliament Briefing – Effects of 5G Wireless Communication on Human Health.” March 2020. Available at “Research to date has not addressed the constant exposure that 5G would introduce”; “Some scientists consider it necessary to establish new exposure limits … based on the biological effects of EMF radiation, rather than on the energy-based specific absorption rate … and they point out that, in the particular case of 5G, the issue is not the potency, but the pulse, the frequency to which the whole population will be exposed due to the dense network of antennas and the estimated billions of simultaneous connections. As 5G employs a very high level of pulsations … Characteristics of the 5G signal such as pulsing seem to increase the biologic and health impacts of exposure, including DNA damage, which is considered to be a cause of cancer. DNA damage is also linked to reproductive decline and neurodegenerative diseases. The 5G Infrastructure Public Private Partnership (5G PPP), a joint initiative between the European Commission and European information and telecommunications (ICT) industry … does not refer to the biological impacts of 5G radiation. The main problem seems to be that it is not currently possible to accurately simulate or measure 5G emissions in the real world. The European Commission has not yet conducted studies on the potential health risks of the 5G technology.

[38] Spain. “Ombudsman says that National 5G Plan has not Undergone Environmental Assessment.” The Secretary of State for Digital Advancement ignored a number of articles of Law 21/2013 on Environmental Assessment, and ongoing pilot 5G projects use a band of frequencies for which the limits for safe exposure have not been fixed, which is contrary to the precautionary principle. 1 September 2019. Available at

[39] The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency possibly carcinogenic to humans in 2011. The IARC has recently prioritised EMF radiation for review in the next five years (2020-2024). See

[40] Report of the Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones (IEGMP), chaired by Sir William Stewart (The Stewart Report). 2000. Available at “… There is also evidence that in some cases people’s well-being may be adversely affected by the insensitive siting of base stations. New mechanisms need to be set in place to prevent that happening. Overall, the report proposes that a precautionary approach be adopted until more robust scientific information becomes available and that the subject be reviewed again in three years time, or before if circumstances demand it.”

[41] European Parliament resolution of 2 April 2009 on health concerns associated with electromagnetic fields (2008/2211(INI)). Available at Para. I: “[W]hereas the EU has laid down exposure limits to protect workers from the effects of EMFs; whereas on the basis of the precautionary principle such measures should also be taken for the sections of population concerned, such as residents and consumers.”

[42] Johansson. “To Bee, or not to Bee.”

[43] Claire Edwards. “BBC Fake News on 5G Decoded.” 15 August 2019. Available at “BBC Fake News sur la 5G décodés: Impacts sur la santé niés malgré des preuves scientifiques accablantes.” Voir

[44] Klaus Buchner and Michèle Rivasi. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Conflicts of Interest, Corporate Capture and the Push for 5G. “This report deals with an issue of which the importance cannot be overrated: the possible health effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (RfR) or electro magnetic fields (EMF); It deals more specifically with how the scientific debate has been hijacked by corporate interests from the Telecom industry. … the European Commission [and] most of the member states … simply close their eyes [to] real scientific facts and early warnings. We have seen exactly the same scenario in the debate on tobacco, asbestos, climate change and pesticides. … ICNIRP pretends to be scientifically neutral, and free from vested interests of the telecom industry. We show with this study that this is ‘playing with the truth’ or simply a lie.” June 2020. Available at

[45] Despicable history of EMF safety guidelines. J.G. Flynn, Captain (Retired from Canadian armed forces). “Irrespective of frequency, EMF radiation can be either thermal – which the human body can sense/detect, or non-thermal – which the human body cannot sense/detect. EMFs are invisible, silent, odourless and tasteless, and it is a heinous crime against humanity that today’s ‘safe’ exposure limits are based solely on the thermal effects. (Congressional Briefing by physicist Dr. Ted Litovitz, 12 July 2001. (

The invention of the microwave oven is credited to Nazi scientist Herbert P. Schwan, and was a spin-off of radar, which killed many WWII radar operators ( Schwan worked at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics, which was founded in 1927 in Berlin, Germany and renamed the Max Planck Institute for Medical Research in 1948 ( The founding director of KWI, Eugen Fischer, warned against overexposure because he was concerned about the ”longer-term ‘genetic health of the race” (The Rise of the Fourth Reich, Jim Marrs, 279:

“The post-WWII US Operation Paperclip brought at least 1,600 scientific and research specialists, including Schwan, and their research into the US to continue their work on eugenics, chemical/bio warfare agents, and mind control/hallucinogenics (

Despite not being a biologist, Schwan claimed microwaves had only thermal (heating) effects [and therefore not biological effects] and in 1953 proposed a “safe” exposure limit of 10 thousand microwatts per cm2 to the US Navy, his employer. The Russian exposure limit is 10 microwatts per square centimetre, 1,000 times less (

“In 1965, the Army and Air Force formally adopted the Schwan limit, and a year later the industry-sponsored American National Standards Institute recommended it as a guideline for worker safety. There were persuasive economic reasons why the 10,000-microwatt standard was and is defended at all costs. Lowering it would have curtailed the expansion of military EMR use and cut into the profits of the corporations that supplied the hardware. A reduced standard now [1985] would constitute an admission that the old one was unsafe, leading to liability for damage claims from ex-GIs and industrial workers. One of the strongest monetary reasons was given in a 1975 classified summary of the DOD’s Tri-Service Electromagnetic Radiation Bioeffects Research Plan: ‘These [lower] standards will significantly restrict the military use of EMR in a peacetime environment and require the procurement of substantial real estate around ground-based EMR emitters to provide buffer zones’.

“However, the safety standard had already become a Procrustean bed against which all research proposals and findings were measured. Grants weren’t given to look for low-level hazards, and scientists who did find such effects were cut down to size. Funds for their work were quickly shut off and vicious personal attacks undermined their reputations. … Soviet research could easily be discounted because of its ‘crudity’, but when nonthermal dangers were documented in America, military and industrial spokespeople simply refused to acknowledge them, lying to Congress and the public.” (Becker, 1985, 305-306).

In 1967, Herbert Pollack, M.D., on behalf of the Institute for Defense Analysis Research and Engineering Support Div. declared that “pulsed microwave is more dangerous than is continuous wave”. (

Even though a device (such as a cell phone or smart meter, etc.) emits its EMFs on RF or microwave frequencies, it does so in pulses, the frequencies of which are also hazardous and much closer to brain wave frequencies (Flynn).

In 1968, in his State of the Union Address, U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson pledged to keep Americans safe in their homes and at work. Specifically, he promised to protect them against hazardous radiation from television sets and other electronic equipment.

In 1971, U.S. President Richard Nixon’s own Management Advisory Council warned: “Power levels in and around American cities, airports … and homes may already be biologically significant.” The population at risk “may well be the entire population”. (Flynn)

In 1975, the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) warned its own personnel of the risks from low level EMR including: microwave sickness (flu-like symptoms, depression, suicidal tendencies) to cancers and leukemia. (Flynn)

“In 1976, a US Army Medical Intelligence and information Agency document entitled ‘Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation (Radiowaves and Microwaves) – in Eurasian Countries’ stated: “If the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there could be unfavourable effects on industrial output and military functions.” (

“Schwan chaired the committee that established the first (1965) US exposure limit for radiofrequency energy, for the American National Standards Institute. This standard evolved into the present IEEE C95.1 ( But even Schwan “consistently maintained that his dosage limit probably isn’t safe for more than an hour” (Becker 306).

Between 1953 and 1979, the USSR irradiated the US embassy in Moscow with microwaves. An article published in Time magazine in 1976 reported that many members of the embassy staff had returned to the US with severe health problems, that two ambassadors had died of cancer, and that a third, Walter Stoessel, was suffering from leukemia. “Washington … never had any formal basis to demand that it be stopped due to danger to the staff. That was apparently considered an acceptable risk in the protection of the lenient US standard.” (Becker, 317; Reviews on Environmental Health, Volume 34: Issue 1 , The “Moscow signal” epidemiological study, 40 years on

From 1971-1981, while working for the US military, Zory Glaser documented “well over 6,000 studies on the bioeffects and health effects of radio frequency and microwave radiation, and a number of these were studies showing that exposure to RF/microwave radiation was able, under certain conditions/circumstances, to produce changes, some of which could be considered dangerous (even at low levels where such exposure did not heat the body).” (

In 1973—47 years ago—the World Health Organization (WHO) knew the truth about the harmful effects of microwave radiation. It published a document based on a symposium held in Warsaw on 15–18 October 1973 and attended by 60 researchers specializing in the biological effects of microwaves on humans. (“The WHO Cover-Up That is Costing Us the Earth”. Olga Sheean. Available at

In 1999, the U.S. Consumer Affairs Commission said: ‘Current thermal guidelines associated with EMR are irrelevant. Cancer and Alzheimer’s are associated with non-thermal EMR effects.” (

In 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency on Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded that RF radiation of frequencies 30 kHz – 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). Recent evidence, including the latest studies on cell phone use and brain cancer risks, indicate that RF radiation is proven carcinogenic to humans and should now be classified as a “Group 1 carcinogen” along with tobacco smoke and asbestos (International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (

The Bioinitiative Report 2012: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF) was drafted by 29 authors from ten countries, ten holding medical degrees (MDs), 21 PhDs, and three MsC, MA or MPHs. It covers upwards of 1,800 studies reporting bioeffects and adverse health effects of electromagnetic fields (powerlines, electrical wiring, appliances and hand-held devices) – and wireless technologies (cell and cordless phones, cell towers, WI-FI, wireless laptops, wireless routers, baby monitors, surveillance systems, wireless utility meters (‘smart meters’), etc. The authors concluded that “Bioeffects are clearly established to occur with very low exposure levels (non-thermal levels) to electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation exposures” (

In 2016, US government personnel serving in Havana, Cuba, began experiencing unusual auditory and/or sensory stimuli of varying intensity and character, along with a series of neurological symptoms. Some scientists suspect that these symptoms were related to a microwave attack. (

In 2016, the European Academy for Environmental Medicine (EUROPAEM) recommended a daytime safety limit for Wi-Fi at 2.4/5.6 GHz (10 Hz pulsing) of only 10 μW/m2, and even less for night-time exposure and sensitive populations. (EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses (

In 2018, the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) Expert Panel on Cell Phone Radiation concluded that the study provided “clear evidence of cancer”. ( “What should happen now is the FDA should be immediately working on developing a quantitative risk assessment from this data and in the meantime the FDA, FCC [US Federal Communications Commission], and other agencies should promote precautionary measures for the population—especially for children,” said Ronald Melnick PhD, who led the design of the NTP study in his 28-year career as a scientist at the National Toxicology Program.

Ray Broomhall. Slideshow, 1 September 2019. Magnetic fields from cell phones are dangerous to children. WHO advises magnetic fields should be lower than 0.3 uT, but evidence shows cell phones irradiate at 6,200 uT.


In 2018, the NTP findings were confirmed by the Ramazzini Study on Radiofrequency Cell Phone Radiation. This was the world’s largest animal study on cell tower radiation and it confirmed a cancer link. (

Most of the world uses the safety guidelines of the self-appointed and –named International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, which is an NGO under German law with no official international standing. Despite this, its guidelines are adopted by the UN’s International Telecommunication Union and World Health Organization and this enables them to be cited as protective by governments and health authorities worldwide.

In late 2019, the FCC confirmed its “Schwan” guidelines as unchanged, despite the existence by then of at least 20,000 peer-reviewed studies on the biological effects of MW radiation (EMF Portal:

Given that for past generations of wireless technology, the FCC usually released only 10 frequencies at a time, while 5G introduces 3,000, Lena Pu suggests that 5G should really be called “297G”! (

The exposure guidelines of both the FCC and ICNIRP are not legal limits and are not enforceable under the law. Both guidelines use averaging (over 30 minutes and 6 minutes respectively) and not peak values to hide the dangerous peak levels of exposure.

In its international classification of diseases, WHO lists as “external causes of morbidity and mortality (V01–Y98), exposure to other nonionizing radiation (W90), and exposure to radiofrequency (W90.0).

Wireless Exposure Limits in Different Countries
The limits are for frequencies between 300Mhz-300GHz in microwatts/cm2
Limit guidelines in the US are from 200 µW/m2 to 1000 µW/m2 for RF radiation, depending on frequency.  Countries developed different standards based on either thermal effects, non-thermal effects or precautionary considerations
Cosmic microwave background radiation we evolved from 0.000,000,0001


Building Biologists benchmark for long term exposure 0.1
BioInitiative Report recommendation – ‘No Observable Effect’ (with factor of 10 added for safety)






To 0.0006
Austria Indoor 0.0001
Austria Outdoor 0.001
Liechtenstein 0.1
Belgium 2.4
Bulgaria 2.4
Luxembourg 2.4
Ukraine 2.4
Switzerland Schools and Hospitals 4.25
Switzerland General 9.5
France 10
Hungary 10
Italy 10
Poland 10
Russia 10
China 40
US from 200
US to 1000
Canada 1000
Schwan 1953 1000
ICNIRP 2020 limit (one degree heating, 6 minutes): 4000

ICNIRP heating limits prevent a temperature rise of one degree within six minutes, based on Schwan’s mistaken hypothesis of 1953 that the only adverse effect from EM energy is heating. In fact many people can increase their body temperature by one degree within six minutes working out in a gym, but without causing the cancers, EHS, infertility, neurological and cardiovascular effects caused by EM exposure.

Nowadays the vast majority of scientists accept the non-thermal effects established for many decades. However, the small clique involving the ICNIRP and the wireless industry activists still refuse to accept the scientific evidence. In 2020 the ICNIRP raised its unscientific and unprotective limit from 10,000,000 µW/m2 to 40,000,000 µW/m2 in order to accommodate the exceedingly high levels of radiation from beams of 5G. (

The Procrustean Approach: Setting Exposure Standards for Telecommunications

Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation: An examination of the manipulation of telecommunications standards by political, military, and industrial vested interests at

the expense of public health protection by Don Maisch PhD (

5 G Wireless Telecommunications Expansion: Public Health and Environmental Implications by Cindy L Russell

A NASA slide show by Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center – Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare (circa 2025) presented in 2001 ( discussed microwave/radiofrequency anti-functional and anti-personnel weaponry, the effects of low-power microwaves; behavioral performance decrements such as seizures, gross alteration in brain function, 30% to 100% increases in brain blood flow, lethality, interactions between low power (microwatts per sq. cm./.4 to 3 GHz) microwaves and brain function. It mentions beam weapons, binary bio into food supply and “anti-functional/fauna”, as well as “some interesting possibilities: surreptitious nano “tagging” (with microwave interrogation) of “everything/ everyone” (imprinted during manufacture/maintenance etc.) and “selective anti-personnel radiofrequency/microwave (towers)”.

[46] Investigate Europe. The 5G Mass-Experiment: Big Promises, Unknown Risks.  13 January 2019. (2 mins.) Available at “But Investigate Europe has found that these bodies are closed clubs. People with dissenting opinions are not invited in. And a significant number of the scientists involved have received funding from companies with vested interests in the 5G rollout. … {I]f you don’t want a hamburger, you can simply avoid hamburgers. With 5G, there is no opt-out.”

[47] Simon Hodges. “How ICNIRP, AGNIR, PHE and a 30 year old political decision created and then covered up a global public health scandal.” Available at

[48] Edwards. “5G Dementors.”

[49] Cece Doucette: Ashland, MA Board of Health EMF/RF Update. 26 June 2018. Available at

[50] International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (5G Space Appeal). Available at “The Earth, the ionosphere and the lower atmosphere form the global electric circuit in which we live. It is well established that biological rhythms—of humans, birds, hamsters, and spiders—are controlled by the Earth’s natural electromagnetic environment and that the well-being of all organisms depends on the stability of this environment, including the electrical properties of the atmosphere. Cherry, in a groundbreaking paper, explained the importance of the Schumann resonances and why ionospheric disturbances can alter blood pressure and melatonin and cause “cancer, reproductive, cardiac and neurological disease and death”.”

[51] “Schumann Resonances and their Effect on Human Bioregulation.” 7 February [2017-2020]. Available at “Recording of Schumann Resonances. Though 7.83 is considered the fundamental Schumann resonance, other frequencies occur between 6 and 50 cycles per second; specifically 7.8, 14, 20, 26, 33, 39 and 45 Hertz, with a daily variation of about +/- 0.5 Hertz (Hz) These frequencies function as a background frequency influencing the biological circuitry of much of the life on Earth. … The first five Schumann resonances overlap with the brain frequency bands or waves. Brain waves are grouped according to their frequencies and are labeled with Greek letters. Their most common frequencies include delta, theta, alpha, and beta.

Delta: 0.5 – 4 Hz This brain rhythm occurs in a deep dreamless sleep or unconsciousness. This is associated with drowsiness.

Theta: 4 – 7 Hz This brain rhythm is associated with drowsiness. It also occurs at the first stage of sleep and during deep meditation, when we are awake but open to mental imagery. It has been associated with creativity, intuition, daydreaming and fantasizing. It is believed to reflect activity from the limbic system and increased activity is observed in anxiety, behavioral activation and inhibition.

Alpha: 7 – 12 Hz This is the major rhythm seen in a normal, relaxed adult. It is present during most of life. It is considered a common state during alertness but not actively processing information. Alpha has been linked to creativity (creative people show alpha when listening and coming to a solution) and mental work. Alpha activity is also associated with overall mental and body/mind coordination, calmness, alertness and learning.

Beta: 12- 30 Hz Beta reflects highly active processing. It occurs during normal waking consciousness and outward attention. Slow beta: 12-17 is normal information processing and mental activity; Fast beta: 17-30 is heightened alertness and fight or flight, or anxiety. “Gamma: 30 – 100 Hz This is associated with waking states and can occur when we are simultaneously processing information in both brain hemispheres. Whales and dolphins also operate in these frequencies. … Research carried out by E. Jacobi at the University of Düsseldorf showed that the absence of Schumann waves creates mental and physical health problems in the human body. Following up on this research, Professor R. Wever from the Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Physiology in Erling-Andechs began a study where he built an underground bunker that completely screened out magnetic fields. He then had student volunteers live in the bunker for four weeks, where they were hermetically sealed in this environment. Throughout the four weeks, Professor Wever noted that the student’s circadian rhythms diverged and that they suffered emotional distress and migraine headaches. Considering that they were young and healthy, no serious health conditions presented – which likely would not have been the case with older people or people with compromised immune systems. Wever then added the Schumann frequency back into the environment and the results were astonishing. After only a brief exposure to 7.8 Hz (the frequency which he had been screening out), the volunteers’ health stabilized.”

[52] Documentary. Generation Zapped. Available at “Generation Zapped investigates the potential dangers of prolonged exposure to Radio Frequencies (RF) from wireless technology; its effects on our health and well-being, as well as the health and development of our children. From its links to breast and brain cancer, to its associations with increased infertility and genetic mutations related to autism and ADHD, to newly developed illnesses, such as Electrical Hyper-Sensitivity (EHS).

“Today we encounter a hundred thousand times the level of radiation from wireless technologies than we did decades ago. Yet the safety standards set by federal regulatory agencies are outdated. New wireless devices such as smart phones, tablets and baby monitors to the latest “Internet of Things” continue to enter the market without any proper pre-market testing or post-market monitoring. Too little is done to ensure public safety and awareness.”

[53] Johansson. “To Bee or not to Bee.” “However, the potential effects that widespread mobile telecommunication antennas have on wild pollinator communities outside the laboratory microcosm are still largely unknown. Lázaro et al [2016] studied the effects of EMR from telecommunication antennas on key wild pollinator groups (wild bees, hoverflies, bee flies, remaining flies, beetles, butterflies, and wasps). They measured EMR [electromagnetic radiation] at 4 distances (50, 100, 200 and 400 m) from 10 antennas (5 on Limnos Island and 5 on Lesvos Island, eastern Mediterranean, Greece), and correlated EMR values with insect abundance and richness (the latter only for wild bees and hoverflies). All pollinator groups except butterflies were affected by EMR.

[54] 5G Space Appeal. “Each satellite will emit millimetre waves with an effective radiated power of up to 5 million watts[6] from thousands of antennas arranged in a phased array.”

[55] Bartomeu Payeras i Cifre. March-April 2020. “Study Shows Direct Correlation between 5G Networks and “Coronavirus” Outbreaks.” Available at

[56] Magda Havas. Is There an Association Between Covid-19 Cases/Deaths and 5G in the United States? 22 April 2020. Available at

“The current radio frequency guidelines in the U.S. do not protect public health.  They are based on a heating effect for short-term exposure.  If you live within 400 m of a cell phone base station you have a greater risk of developing cancer and a greater risk of neurohormonal dysregulation and this is based on similar frequencies currently emitted by 5G antennas.  Numerous scientific studies document impaired immune function, which could make individuals more susceptible to viral and bacterial infections.  Covid-19 had a great impact on the elderly as they often have suboptimal immune function.  Sage and Kerst (March 27, 2020) provide a list of more than 20 studies documenting a “disrupted immune function from exposure to low-intensity non-ionizing radiation (radiofrequency radiation).”  This disruption occurs at levels well below the FCC [Federal Communications Commission] guidelines.”

[57] A search for “immune system” on the University of Aachen EMF Portal garners 642 hits. Available at The site summarizes scientific research data on the effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) and contains an extensive literature database with an inventory of 31,446 publications and 6,754 summaries of individual scientific studies on the effects of electromagnetic fields.

[58] Becker. The Body Electric. 293. “Electromagnetic energy isn’t consciously perceived, however. It tricks the immune system into fighting a shadow. Thus we can predict that, just like a fire company answering a false alarm, the body will be less able to fight a real fire.”

[59] T.E. Bearden. Oblivion: America at the Brink. 47-48. Available at.

The True Cause of Gulf War Disease. [I]t is possible to trick the immune system of each person in the targeted populace area so that it erroneously “detects” invasion by, say, two dozen different pathogens at once. This is done by simply placing the EM [electromagnetic] ‘shadow disease engines’ or ‘shadow precursor engines’ … for those specific pathogenic conditions in weak EM radiation or in quantum potentials focused into the bodies in the area targeted. The immune system reacts to what it detects, not necessarily to what is actually occurring. Given this deliberate stimulation and the resulting alarming false detection, the deceived immune system desperately spreads its finite assets across those “detected” two dozen invading “shadow” pathogens. … Such a “spread” immune system is then just about totally vulnerable to any real attack by any normal opportunistic real pathogen in the area — either natural or terrorist-induced — because the immune system cannot marshal any additional resources. In a bizarre way, this is a new form of asymmetric biological warfare, designed to pre-disable the immune systems of the targeted

populace. …  That living body with its spread immune system will shortly develop a whole “cocktail” mix of opportunistic diseases.”

[60] Arthur Firstenberg. 5G Space Appeal newsletter: “The Evidence Mounts”. 6 May 2020. Available at “[B]y April 21 the number of reported sick and dead birds was around 26,000. Although this disease is being blamed on a bacterium, its resemblance to COVID-19 cannot be avoided. The birds are being described as “apathetic birds with breathing problems.” They cannot eat, appear to be “unquenchably thirsty,” and then die. Extreme thirst is a widely-reported effect of microwave radiation. It is also commonly reported in cases of COVID-19.”

[61] Video by Multerland. Arthur Firstenberg. 5G, Birds, Bees, and Humanity. 12 August 2018. Available at (40 mins.)

[62] Sam Milham. “5G To Kill The Birds, Bees And Your Loved Ones?” Available at Excerpt. “Birds And The Earth’s Magnetic Field”

“Typical effects of radiation from cellular communication antennas on resident, breeding, and migratory birds: site abandonment, feather deformation, locomotion problems, weight loss, weakness, reduced survivorship and death. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service continues to suggest to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and to Congress the pressing need for studies based on cumulative negative effects of RFR [radiofrequency radiation] exposure on migratory birds under the National Environmental Policy Act.

“Citing a variety of scientific research, the U.S. Department of the Interior in February of 2014 called on the National Telecommunications and Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce to formulate or modify policies and procedures for cellular communications towers so that they are in conformity with Executive Order 13186 Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds and do not threaten from the towers’ emissions of RFR the 241 species of endangered or threatened U.S. birds.

“In 2003 three conservation organizations filed a lawsuit against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The groups, Forest Conservation Council, American Bird Conservancy, and Friends of the Earth sought to enjoin the FCC from issuing any new licenses for the building of communication towers in the Gulf Coast region until their impact on migratory birds has been fully assessed and mitigated. The suit cited violations by the FCC of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and Endangered Species Act (ESA) in the deaths of thousands of migrating birds at towers along the Gulf Coast.”

[63] Arthur Firstenberg. 5G Space Appeal newsletter.  30 August 2019. Available at

(Excerpt) “Birds in Peril”. “Canadian scientists with the National Research Council proved already in the 1960s that bird feathers make good receiving aerials for microwave radiation and that low-level microwaves cause birds distress, deteriorated health and mortality [Spanish]. Spanish biologist Alfonso Balmori has proved that radio waves interfere with nesting and reproduction. Scientists at the University of Oldenburg in Germany have proved that radio waves interfere with bird migration. Two weeks ago, I received a phone call from geneticist Julian Northey in Ontario, Canada. He told me that last year, many Canadian geese were so disoriented that they never flew south for the winter. He observed flocks of geese near the shore of Lake Ontario, flying due east one day, due west the following day, and due east the day after that. In the dead of winter, in January and into February, when they should have been south in a warmer climate, they were still in Canada flying back and forth, unable to find their bearings, honking and honking in distress.

“Unlike irradiated humans, irradiated birds are not on anti-depressants and anti-anxiety medications. Instead, they are attacking people. “Proving Hitchcock Right, Bird Attacks Are Turning Violent This Summer”, read a July 15, 2019 headline in the Wall Street Journal. In Massachusetts, Minnesota, British Columbia, Montana, Colorado and Illinois, red-winged

blackbirds, crows, hawks and wild turkeys are divebombing people and whacking them in the head. In Bulgaria in June, 5G was tested for the first time in Sofia. According to an email I received on July 17 from a 20-year-old girl who lives there, this resulted in the deaths of more than 700 pigeons — reminiscent of an earlier, similar report from The Hague.”

[64] Arthur Firstenberg. 5G Space Appeal newsletter: “Is the Sky Really Falling?” 27 March 2020. Available at

[65] 26 Nov 2018 – Hundreds Of Birds Dead During 5G Experiment In Netherlands Link, 12 Oct 2019 – Mass bird death Coventry UK Link, 10 January 2020 – Dozens of wild birds found dead, ‘reason unknown’, in Kuban, Russia. Link, 5 Feb 2020 – Mystery of Massive Bird Deaths in Rome Link, 6 February 2020 – Thousands of flamingos dead due to disease in Mazandaran, Iran Link, 25 February 2020 – Dozens of dead birds again found in North Wales Link, 26 February 2020 – 100+ dead birds found along road in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, America Link, 3 March 2020 – 1,000+ dead birds found in Sikeston, Missouri, America Link, 11 March 2020 – 120 Birds Fall Dead from Sky, ‘A Mystery’ in Triboltingen, Switzerland Link, 16 April 2020 – 100+ Dead Birds Found, ‘A Mystery – Dead Birds Everywhere’, on the Island of Laeso, Denmark Link, 23 Apr 2020 – Fear explodes across Europe as thousands of birds drop dead from the sky Link, 25 Apr 2020 – Hundreds of Birds Fall Dead onto Cruise Ship Link, 22 Apr 2020 – Thousands of Dead and Dying Blue Tit Birds Found, ‘A Mystery’ in Germany Link, 4 May 2020 – Hundreds of Sea Birds Dead in a Fjord in Oslo, Norway Link.

27 June 2019 – Mystery of ‘suicidal’ mice jumping to their deaths from aqueduct Link, 16 Feb 2019 – Testing of 5G Wi-Fi troubles cows. Should we be concerned too? Link, 26 Apr 2019 – French farmers sue the state over mystery cow deaths they blame on electromagnetic fields Link

[66] Video. A flock of angry cockatoos attack a 5G tower by ripping out wires with their beaks. Daily Mail. 25 May 2020. (51 secs.)

[67] Funneman. 79. “The worst tsunami ever recorded in recent human history took place in Sri Lanka on 5 January 2005. It took the lives of thousands of people … but no animals were found among the wreckage, the corpses and the debris.”

[68] Conversations with author in Bosnia and Ireland.

[69] Video. Claire Edwards: Electricity and Flu Connection May Explain “Viruses”. 20 March 2020. Available at (8 mins.)

[70] Take Back Your Power. Professor Olle Johnasson. “Experts and doctors warn: Pregnant women and children should not be exposed to wireless radiation.” 23 Ocgtober 2014. Available at

[71] Arthur Firstenberg. No Place to Hide. “Satellites Begin Worldwide Service: Health Problems Coincide.” Vol. 2, No. 1, Feb. 1999, 3-4. Available at “[T]ypical symptoms of electrical illness such as headaches, dizziness, nausea, insomnia, nosebleeds, heart palpitations, asthma attacks, ringing in the ears, etc. One person said it felt like a knife went through the back of her head early Wednesday morning. Another had stabbing pains in the chest. More than one person, including this writer, were so sick they weren’t sure they were going to pull through. Followups revealed that some of these people were acutely ill for up to three weeks. This writer suddenly lost his sense of smell on September 23, and it still has not returned to normal. (Russian researchers Y.A. Lobanova and Z.V. Gordon wrote in 1960 that loss of olfactory sensitivity was one of the earliest signs of microwave influence.) … A 4% to 5% rise in the [US] national death rate occurred during those two weeks. This is also the time period that thousands of homing pigeons got lost in races throughout much of the eastern 2/3 of the United States.” No Place to Hide, Vol. 3, No. 2, Nov. 2001, 3-4 & 15.

[72] Firstenberg. “Planetary Emergency”. Available at “But the events that made the news were catastrophic losses of race horse foals that were reported throughout the United States and as far away as Peru. On June 5, 2001, Iridium added data and Internet to its satellite phone service. Again came widespread reports of nausea, flu-like illness and oppression, and this time also hoarseness.”

[73] Arthur Firstenberg. Cancel-Your-Cellphone-Account Day, June 20-21, 2020. Available at Bangkok Post. “Horse Deaths Lead to Race Against Time.” 19 May 2020.

[74] Robert O. Becker. 1985. [Note. 1996/97: UK phone ownership stood at 16% of households. A decade later the figure was 80%.] The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life. 327-328. “All cities, by their very nature as electrical centers, are jungles of interpenetrating fields and radiation that completely drown out the earth’s background throb. Is this an underlying reason why so many of them have become jungles in another sense as well? Is this a partial explanation for the fact that the rate of suicide between the ages of fifteen and twenty-four rose from 5.1 per 100,000 in 1961 to 12.8 in 1981? Might this be an invisible and thus overlooked reason why so many governments leaders, working at the centers of the most powerful electromagnetic networks, consistently make decisions that are against the best interests of every being on earth? Is the subliminal stress of electronic smog misinterpreted as continual threats from outside—from other people and other governments? In addition, if Teilhard de Chardin’s noosphere exists, our artificial fields must mask it many times over, literally disconnecting us from life’s collective wisdom. This is not to ignore the plain face of evil, but it often seems there must be some other reason why today’s power elite are so willing to bring the whole world to the brink of so many different kinds of destruction. Maybe they literally can’t hear the earth anymore. … I believe the ultimate weapon is manipulation of our electromagnetic environment, because it’s imperceptibly subtle and strikes at the core of life itself. We’re dealing here with the most important scientific discovery ever—the nature of life. Even if we survive the chemical and atomic threats to our existence, there’s a strong possibility that increasing electropollution could set in motion irreversible changes leading to our extinction before we’re even aware of them.”

[75] Punch. “Senate asks FG to suspend 5G network deployment.” 5 May 2020. Available at “The Senate on Tuesday asked the Federal Government to suspend the planned deployment of the Fifth Generation Network in Nigeria. … Senator Uche Ekwunife … said her motion was borne out of the need to assure Nigerians of their safety by asking the Federal Government to postpone the launch until a proper investigation was carried out. … Deputy Majority Leader, Senator Ajayi Boroffice, said … the experts should be allowed to handle it and deliberate on the merits and demerits of its deployment. Senator Opeyemi Bamidele said it would be irresponsible of any government to subscribe to a technology that won’t be safe for its citizens.”

[76] Environmental Health Trust. “Slovenia halts 5G to Investigate Health and Safety.”  18 March 2020. Available at “5G has been halted in Slovenia while officials take more time to investigate health effects of the new technology. A letter from Minister Rudi Medved (unofficial translation below) states they will reopen the debate on potential health risks. Be aware that over 180 Cities in Italy have passed Halt 5G Resolutions, several cities in USA have passed protective ordinances to restrict 5G in neighborhoods and municipalities worldwide are slowing and halting the 5G rollout because of published research showing harm from wireless radiation.”

[77] Claire Edwards. “How the Telecom Companies Are Losing the Battle to Impose 5G Against the Will of the People.”  17 December 2019. Available at

[78] Switzerland. “La Confédération reporte indéfiniment ses directives techniques sur la 5G. (Confederation’s release of technical guidelines on 5G postponed indefinitely).” 12 February 2020. Available at (English translation by the author.) “In the absence of a framework in which to work, the cantons are becoming impatient. In a letter sent to them at the end of [January 2020], the Confederation said it would continue to work on technical guidelines, but could not give a timetable for their publication. The development of the guidelines is expected to take ‘some time’.

“The government is justifying the delay by stressing the need to carry out tests under real conditions. Right now no global standard exists on which the Federal Office for the Environment could base its recommendation. The measurement methods currently developed by the Institute of Metrology will be used in the development of the guidelines.

“Legal context unclear”

“How the radiation exposure arising from directional antennas will be calculated is also not specified. These antennas emit mobile phone radiation directionally and can give rise over a short period to higher exposures. The government has been working on recommendations on the question for some time. Until they are determined, telecommunications companies cannot use these new antennas.

“However, the delays and moratoria are not prompting any slowdown in the expansion of 5G antennas in Switzerland, as evidenced by the installation of 2,000 of them in six months. ‘Deployment is taking place in a legal context that is unclear, which is never good for the development of a new technology’, says Jean-François Steiert, Vice-President of the Swiss Conference of Directors of Planning, Environment and Construction. ‘There is a risk of granting permits in places that subsequently no longer meet the conditions, or of not granting them in places that fail to meet the conditions currently but subsequently do so. The rules of the game are likely to change,‘ he explained to La Matinale newspaper on Wednesday.’”

[79] An Internet search on 16 June 2020 for the term “5G ecosystem” garners 159,000 hits.

[80] Debate in UK parliament: Electromagnetic Fields – Health Effects, 25 June 2019. Video: (from 16. 35). Transcript:

[81] Archbishop Viganò’s letter to President Trump: “There is an Eternal Struggle Between Good and Evil”. 8 June 2020.  Online article: click here. Available at

 “And it is disconcerting that there are Bishops – such as those whom I recently denounced – who, by their words, prove that they are aligned on the opposing side. They are subservient to the deep state, to globalism, to aligned thought, to the New World Order which they invoke ever more frequently in the name of a universal brotherhood which has nothing Christian about it, but which evokes the Masonic ideals of those who want to dominate the world by driving God out of the courts, out of schools, out of families, and perhaps even out of churches. The American people are mature and have now understood how much the mainstream media does not want to spread the truth but seeks to silence and distort it, spreading the lie that is useful for the purposes of their masters. However, it is important that the good – who are the majority – wake up from their sluggishness and do not accept being deceived by a minority of dishonest people with unavowable purposes. It is necessary that the good, the children of light, come together and make their voices heard.”

[82] Catholic clergy led by former papal nuncio Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò and Cardinals

Gerhard Ludwig Mueller, Joseph Zen, and Janis Pujats have joined an appeal “for the Church

and the world” that warns that the COVID-19 pandemic is being used as a “pretext” by world

leaders to “control” people, strip them of their fundamental rights, while providing a

“disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control”. Available at “In this time of great crisis, we Pastors of the Catholic Church, by virtue of our mandate, consider it our sacred duty to make an Appeal to our Brothers in the Episcopate, to the Clergy, to Religious, to the holy People of God and to all men and women of good will. This Appeal has also been undersigned by intellectuals, doctors, lawyers, journalists and professionals who agree with its content, and may be undersigned by those who wish to make it their own.”

“The facts have shown that, under the pretext of the Covid-19 epidemic, the inalienable rights of citizens have in many cases been violated and their fundamental freedoms, including the exercise of freedom of worship, expression and movement, have been disproportionately and unjustifiably restricted. Public health must not, and cannot, become an alibi for infringing on the rights of millions of people around the world, let alone for depriving the civil authority of its duty to act wisely for the common good. This is particularly true as growing doubts emerge from several quarters about the actual contagiousness, danger and resistance of the virus. Many authoritative voices in the world of science and medicine confirm that the media’s alarmism about Covid-19 appears to be absolutely unjustified.

“We have reason to believe, on the basis of official data on the incidence of the epidemic as related to the number of deaths, that there are powers interested in creating panic among the world’s population with the sole aim of permanently imposing unacceptable forms of restriction on freedoms, of controlling people and of tracking their movements. The imposition of these illiberal measures is a disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control. …”

[83] Julian Rose. “Synthetic Electric Shock—From Electrification To 5G WiFi.” 4 February 2019. Available at “We are by nature electric; but the man-made ‘synthetic’ variety, that apes nature’s version, is not helping us to live a full and healthy life, but is rather stultifying that condition. In fact Edison, Tesla et al. were not really doing the world a favour when they invented and put to use ‘synthetic electricity’ on this planet.

“In a medical hypothesis by Samuel Milham of Washington State Department of Health (2009) entitled  “Historical evidence that electrification caused the 20th century epidemic of diseases of civilisation” Milham reveals that once Thomas Edison began electrifying New York City in 1880, the onward march of electrification correlated with sharp rises in cardiovascular disease, diabetes, suicide and cancer.

“Whereas on farms and countryside areas which lagged a long way behind urban areas in acquiring electrification, incidences of such disease were barely ever seen. It was not until the 1950s that the majority of US farms got hooked-up onto electrical power. …

“According to the author, in 1900 heart disease and cancer in the USA were 4th and 8th on the list of leading causes of death, and by 1940 heart disease had risen to 1st and cancer to 2nd place and have remained in that position ever since. The authors of a separate study of 1930 mortality statistics noted that the cancer rates for cities were 58.2% higher than those for rural areas; yet diets were very similar. …

“It is not that they didn’t mean well, no doubt they did, but the revolution that electric light first brought about, also took man a further step away from his origins as ‘a being of nature’.”

[84] Arthur Firstenberg. Summary of Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life. Available at

[85] Min-Sun Kim. Non-Western Perspectives on Human Communication: Implications for Theory and Practice. 2002. 82. Westerners tend to conceive themselves as a machine while Japanese see themselves as deriving from nature, analogous to a plant.

[86] Video. Why is Earth’s magnetic shield weakening? – Space. Available at (12 mins.) “Life on earth wouldn’t be possible without the magnetic field protecting our planet. But research shows that it’s weakening fast. … We’re only just starting to understand this vital force of nature and its puzzling behaviour.”

[87] 5G Space Appeal. “International agreements are being violated”. Available at and Bonnor. Legal Opinion. (

[88] Barrie Trower. Wi-Fi: A Thalidomide in the Making – Who Cares? 2013. Available at – a Thalidomide in the making – who cares-moh.pdf.

[89] Video. UN Agenda 21 and Modern Monetary Theory. February 2020. (12 mins.) Available at (12 mins.) The Green Agenda. Undated. Available at

[90] Alex Newman. Interview. United Nations Tool to Destabilize Countries & Usher in Agenda 21, World Dominance. Available at

[91] Defense Science Board Task Force. “Defense Applications of 5G Network Technology.” 24 June 2019. Available at “Emerging 5G network technology offers the Department of Defense (DoD) access to advanced communications and networking with much improved data rates, lower latency, and significant potential energy savings over existing 4G networks. The integration of 5G technology could give DoD an opportunity to adopt at lower cost the benefits of these systems for operational needs. Improved commercially available 5G technology offers DoD many operational benefits but also presents new challenges in cyber security, spectrum management and network optimization. The Defense Science Board (DSB) Quick Task Force (TF) on Defense Applications of 5G Network Technology was established to define a path for potential DoD 5G adoption that mitigates supply chain risk, establishes spectrum co-existence procedures and revamps existing communication infrastructure.”

[92] South Front. “SpaceX ‘Starlink’ Satellite Constellation Reveals Itself as Tool Of US Military.” 12 March 2020. Available at The idea is to have the satellites allegedly serve an entirely humanitarian and civilian purpose – provide high-speed internet. However, that appears to be entirely contrary to the truth. In February 2020, the US Air Force and SpaceX announced that they would collaborate for a live fire exercise on April 8th. … The demonstration will reportedly involve shooting down a drone and a cruise missile and will take place at several different sites … The massive tests will also include ground forces, submarines, ships, and a variety of space-based assets. The live fire exercise will be part of a larger test of the Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS), a new communications ecosystem designed to enable Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2), allowing U.S. forces and allies to coordinate military operations in real-time across all domains, such as sea, land, air, space and cyber operations. … It will also add new capabilities that leverage the latest in machine learning, or artificial intelligence, to better predict what types of information users want from the system and more prominently push that information to them.

[93] London Declaration Issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in London 3-4 December 2019. Available at

[94] Video. Claire Edwards. 5G Satellites and NATO Putting the World at Risk. Available at (6 mins.)

[95] Claire Edwards. BBC Fake News on 5G Decoded. 15 August 2019. Available at RT America. Explosive: NY Times 5G ties uncovered. 13 May 2019.

[96] NaturalNews. “Anatomy of President Trump’s executive order to end political bias by the tech giants and challenge Sec. 230.” 28 May 2020. Available at

President Trump’s executive order establishes the fact that tech platforms are the modern-day “public square” in which public debate and free speech must be allowed to flourish and confirms that protecting free speech is “essentially to sustaining democracy. petition with 110K anti-5G signatures deleted. 9 April 2020. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates team up for a $30 million investment in petition site 27 May 2017. Available at

[97]Council of the European Union. Shaping Europe’s Digital Future – Council Conclusions. 9 June 2020. Available at Para. 36. STRESSES that[,in the context of] the roll out of new technologies such as 5G/6G [it is appropriate to] preserve the abilities of law enforcement [*French version: “repressive”] authorities, security [services] and the [court system] to perform their legitimate functions effectively. TAKES into account the international guidelines concerning the health impact of electromagnetic fields. EXPRESSES the importance of [combatting] the spread of misinformation related to 5G networks, with special regard to false claims that such networks constitute a health threat or are linked to COVID-19.” [Amended by the author to conform to the original French version.]

[98] Rosemary Frei. The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism. OffGuardian. 23 April 2020. Available at “There are just seven steps from pandemic declaration to permanent totalitarianism – and many jurisdictions are about to start Step 5. As if it was planned in advance, billions of people around the globe are being forced step by rapid step into a radically different way of life, one that involves far less personal, physical and financial freedom and agency. Here is the template for rolling this out. …”

[99] German Lawyer Sent to Psych Ward for Organizing Protest Against COVID-19 Lockdown. 15 April 2020. Available at “In the Soviet Union, activists were sent to state psychiatric wards. According to the state, any and all opposition to government policy was considered a form of mental illness. … Bahner had become known in the past few days with a call for nationwide demonstrations and an urgent application for the abolition of all corona protective measures,” reports Welt. “The [medical specialist] lawyer from Heidelberg considers the corona rules to be excessive and advocates for them to be abolished.”

[100] Armstrong Economics. Reports are that the Swiss Also Locked up a Doctor for being Against the Coronavirus Fraud. 12 April 2020. Available at “Anyone who speaks out against the coronavirus is simply being arrested in some places in Europe. This is a shocking result that is unfolding across Europe. The question is WHY? This is not only Stalinistic, but crushing dissent must mean there is a hidden agenda.”

[101] Lorenzo di Sandro. Medical dictatorship as a method of repression and control. Dario Musso’s case in Italy. Available at

[102] Becker. The Body Electric. 329. “Our survival depends on the ability of upright scientists and other people of goodwill to break the military-industrial death grip on our policy-making institutions.”

Posted in: 5G

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.